# PS + P96 = Racially Sensitive Results

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ps-p96-racially-sensitive-results/32352>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [September 10, 2009, 11:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ps-p96-racially-sensitive-results/32352 "2009-09-10T23:17:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\
**Post date:** [September 10, 2009, 11:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/ps-p96-racially-sensitive-results/32352/1 "2009-09-10T23:17:40Z")

</div>

Mixing P96 with Panty Scorcher has been something that would seem to make sense for an even more sexually oriented [pheromone](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/) mix. But as the calculator is showing me… it’s not that simple.

Panty Scorcher + P96 = wildly different results by race at the same dose.

So far I have determined that black women seem to respond best to even smaller doses of PS than normal (and they seem to respond best to a smaller than normal dose of PS already) and a medium-small dose of P96. But hispanic women seem to lose something from the PS that means that they need more PS, and it has to be coupled with a fairly high dose of P96.

I haven’t had a chance to test around Caucasian women yet, so I haven’t done any Caucasian optimization calcs, but this is the most racially sensitive mix I have seen so far.

I guess my dreams of just adding P96 to PS just died. On the other hand… now we may be able to more specifically target women of certain races than before. Maybe we can even be more specific with hair colors, too?