# quantity vs quality

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [April 25, 2011, 12:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998 "2011-04-25T12:52:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jazzysax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/bbe5ce/32.png) [@jazzysax](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jazzysax)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2011, 12:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/1 "2011-04-25T12:52:18Z")

</div>

I’m going at my second round, and I figured I’d leave it up to a vote. If you were to get [pheromones](https://a314.com/) for free, would you rather want to get IO 1x and IH 1x OR IO 4x by itself?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tisha23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@tisha23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tisha23)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2011, 2:10pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/2 "2011-04-25T14:10:38Z")

</div>

It depends on your dosage at the regular strength. If you wear more then 4 sprays of it normally then 4X would be worth it to use just one spray.

More is not better with pheromones. They dont work that way.

Tisha

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RADMAN513](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/radman513/32/364_2.png) [@RADMAN513](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/RADMAN513)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2011, 2:11pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/3 "2011-04-25T14:11:45Z")

</div>

I think IO and IH would give you more versatility than a single super concentrated dose of just the one could.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fade1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/fade1/32/1949_2.png) [@Fade1](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Fade1)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2011, 7:01am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/4 "2011-04-26T07:01:09Z")

</div>

What do YOU find harder?  
Chatting to people, or chatting to people about something interesting?

The 'mones are only half the battle.

Personally I would pick IO as the openers are the hardest for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jazzysax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/bbe5ce/32.png) [@jazzysax](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jazzysax)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2011, 2:53pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/5 "2011-04-26T14:53:59Z")

</div>

> [@Fade1](#):
>
> What do YOU find harder?  
> Chatting to people, or chatting to people about something interesting?
> 
> The 'mones are only half the battle.
> 
> Personally I would pick IO as the openers are the hardest for me.

I think openers are tough as well, and would like a female to start the conversation too. (It seems like I am always doing that) I think I’m leaning toward IO because of that. Maybe once something is settled, IH can come in to play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TwistedOstrich](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/twistedostrich/32/627_2.png) [@TwistedOstrich](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/TwistedOstrich)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2011, 3:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/6 "2011-04-26T15:00:27Z")

</div>

I will use some buffet logic, I like to eat and I would say more is better when eating. But having IH and IO would be more variety… it would insure I don’t get sick of eating one thing over and over. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown0001](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/unknown0001/32/559_2.png) [@unknown0001](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/unknown0001)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2011, 3:31am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/7 "2011-04-27T03:31:26Z")

</div>

Get BOTH…IO & IH…and then once you realize, some women wont STFU, while wearing lots of IO, you might do what I did and get rid of it cause who wants to hear women talk that much (whoops) I’m getting mself in trouble with the ladies 😉

seriously…they both have there own thing..so use both…but I loooove IH

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maidenfan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Maidenfan01](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Maidenfan01)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2011, 5:18am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/8 "2011-04-27T05:18:20Z")

</div>

Personally, I like IH better. IO has its purpose, but once you get a few of those “connected” type hits with IH, you’ll be amazed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RADMAN513](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/radman513/32/364_2.png) [@RADMAN513](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/RADMAN513)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2011, 1:24pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/quantity-vs-quality/189998/9 "2011-04-27T13:24:53Z")

</div>

I realize you meant quantity of mones vs quality, assuming you figure the higher concentration to be the quality aspect, and the variety of two products to be the quantity.

But consider it this way…quantity of conversation vs quality.  
When I first started with these products IO was one of the easiest ones to spot the differences with. Conversations started easier, with more frequency and lasted longer…and they were generally pleasant enough.  
At first I was torn about IH. I noticed an increase in conversation but not like with IO. Initiatially I chalked it up to IH being a weaker version of IO (I was still new and not catching what was really happening).  
The talking going on was becoming deeper and more serious. People were more inclined to open up to me about things that sometimes could be considered sensitive topics. The positive side effect is that there’s an emotional/action effect that occurs with IH that I’ve noticed.

You wear IH and people somehow feel inclined to open up more and confide in you.  
The feeling the IH creates coupled with their acting on it convinces them that you are an honest and trustworthy person, as well as a person they have a sense of connection to.  
As a consequence they are also more inclined to accept things you say to them. Now it’s far from being instant compliance (but it can be when coupled with A314.) but it’s more along the lines of the kind of effect instant trust is alleged to create. Which leads me to suspect that there may be some sort of cause and effect feedback effect with regards to beta androstenol and oxytocin.

So imo going with both and starting with IO which says “fun guy” and moving on toward IH which says “sincere guy” is a natural progression and makes conversations go from a lot of talk, to deeper talk.
