# Question about layering

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/question-about-layering/17065>\
**Category:** Pheromone Theory & Molecules\
**Created:** [August 7, 2008, 2:29am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/question-about-layering/17065 "2008-08-07T02:29:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bosshank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@bosshank](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bosshank)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2008, 3:05am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/question-about-layering/17065/37 "2008-08-31T03:05:57Z")

</div>

> [@Bella](#):
>
> Awww c’mon guys, I don’t wanna camp! I wanna stay at the Hilton!

I can go either way but I know what you are saying …

> [@Bella](#):
>
> Tisha’s strong personality doesn’t get in the way of her observations.

I was not trying to communicate that … my bad.

> [@tisha23](#):
>
> I still stick by my theory and appling this way. I have better success when I apply with purpose like Jassy taught me. Maybe BH is right and I just read people really well. Who knows, Its still worth a try for people when they want to keep things interesting.

That is what I was trying to say - Tisha is good at reading people - very much a watcher. Not that Bella isn’t - they just strike me as different styles …

> [@Bella](#):
>
> If I’m right with the above assessment of what you’re saying here…I don’t think the layering has that much to do with anything disappearing as far as social style goes. I’m not sure I getcha ya, BH, but I think I agree.

I think that if there is a diffference with layering it is a very subtle one that dissappears into the overall effect of the combined pheros when you have a strong social interaction as opposed to keeping the level of interaction down … if that makes sense.

> [@Bella](#):
>
> If the layering thing was that important why would Androtics combine so many different pheromones in one MX? So it’s not any individual pheromone they’re reacting to. It’s the combined pheromones, each in a specific dose per spray, that produces the overall effect that provokes the response. At least that’s the way I see it. Is that what you mean by overall direction of the pheromones?

Exactly - even Tisha kinda seems to go in that direction in my thread …

> [@A314 and Ammo Combo Question](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-and-ammo-combo-question/13257):
>
> I use both or variants on a near daily basis. Now there is some overlap in the individual pheromones in both products although A314 certainly has more as reported and the ratios are also certainly different. My question is this: When we wear both A314 and Ammo at the same time are we sending out the two distinct signals of Ammo and A314 … or are we just throwing out a lot of signal, but one that is neither really one or the other? If it is the latter are we just sending out an off-kilter A314 …

> [@A314 and Ammo Combo Question](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/a314-and-ammo-combo-question/13257/4):
>
> No its not really 2 separate signals. When you wear AMMO with A314 you increase the sexiness and interest vibe. You still have the respect trust vibe going though people will be less taken back by the sternness of A314. I think for the older guys its not a problem with overlapping pheromones. I think younger guys should use one or the other as there base pheromone or cut down on the dosage of each if worn together.
> 
> So A314 on its own predominately says… Respect, trust, alpha, signals leader, it says I am the most important man in the room.
> 
> AMMO on its own says Sexy, attractive, interesting, arousing
> 
> Together they say Sexy interesting respected alpha leader. The hottest alpha in the room.

Of course I guess Tisha could also argue the depending which one a guy applied first he would be slightly more sexy or slightly more respected alpha leader.

> [@schell0385](#):
>
> Mixing ingredients together can make a difference in the world of chemistry …(but) my guess is since there is not a strong chemical response involved, something like a chain reaction, that it would not make a difference.

I think you are basically saying the same as Bella but in a different way .. but I think you are both right.

> [@Bella](#):
>
> So I take it that’s what you mean by high intensity, constant, social engagement…that you really just get so rapped up in conversation with the person or group you’re interacting with and miss hits? Or, as I said, I may not be understanding you correctly.

Not so much as not noticing the differences of subtle effects but more so that a strong social interaction overscomes what might be subtle differences in applying x on top of y and instead the they react to the overall effect of the pheromones as I said above.

> [@Bella](#):
>
> Wolf calls me Eagle Eye…lol…and says I have ears like a bat. … Either way, I have a strong social personality and a keen ability to read people. … Not sure if that lines up with your assesment _of me_ either…lol.

It does - pretty much as I figured … from my read on your many posts, personality, etc.. I mean as long as he means you your hearing is good when he says you have ears like a bat … lol. 😮

> [@Bella](#):
>
> It’s kinda like how guys sneak looks at girls with big boobs without their wives noticing. You guys know how to do that, right?

Why _I_ would _never_ notice a set of boobs other than my wife’s. 🙄 Actually I thought guys snuck looks at just about any girl with boobs regardless of their size … lol. 😛

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/question-about-layering/17065)._
