# Questions on testing a few of the new mx packs

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/questions-on-testing-a-few-of-the-new-mx-packs/63670>\
**Category:** Women's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [January 16, 2015, 7:39pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/questions-on-testing-a-few-of-the-new-mx-packs/63670 "2015-01-16T19:39:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charles\_W](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/22d042/32.png) [@Charles\_W](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Charles_W)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2015, 9:04am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/questions-on-testing-a-few-of-the-new-mx-packs/63670/4 "2015-01-18T09:04:00Z")

</div>

Yes, Miss.

The Vanilia Copulins each contain a different copulins formulation. It proved VERY difficult to find a designer could make copulins that assay to our quality standards. We originally carried copulins, but they weren’t a mainstream part of our product line. Copulins quality deteriorated, and what limited supplies were available on market didn’t meet our internal standards, so were obliged to drop them.

These are the first in years we feel willing to stand behind. Yet they remain experimental. Please do report on each bottle in the pack by itself. That goes for each pack. Thereafter, feel free to mix & match and report upon your own combinations.

I should say the sensual duo, one of them from the pack should be a useful addition with the copulins and something such as Instant Sexiness. Similarly, one might add copulins to IS/A or B.

I’ve been told men can do as well. Should be perfectly fine to add the Vanilia Copulins or one of the Sensual Duo to a Men’s product. That’s all I can say for now during blind testing.

To restate clearly:

Some feedback is required for each pack.

It could be just a paragraph on this board, by phone or email.

I’ve not been told a distinct report on each MX bottle of the pack is needed. That would be OK but not entirely mandatory. I’ll see from Brian more specifics. That’s what we’ve agreed so far.

We’d hope you test each bottle for social effects by itself at least once.

If you we’re to phone in a report on just MX480 but not 481, that, for example, would be fine at present.

Sometimes, a quick comment such as “Sprayed MX481 twice by itself. Really liked it. Lots of flirting and great self effects. Will order more.” Those few words are fine report. We’re not expecting a novel. Just 100 words on the two bottles in pack of that sort, a few quick sentences, are good feedback.

This is the same as you’d find in a Yelp review perhaps. “Ate something of the menu. Food good, service good, 4 stars, will recommend to others.”

Some feedback of some sort on at least one bottle per pack is just fine.

In future those who’ve ordered a pack but in 90 days have not reached out to us, we’ll likely reach out to _them_ by email.

MX135 and that lot of restocked mixes are experimental in a broad sense.

MX480 and Copulins are very experimental. Feedback directly decides which get restocked. Whereas MX135 is less experimental and thus will be stocked indefinitely.

[In this one of few threads](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/behind-the-scenes-mx-formula-cheat-sheets/37364) where any mention has been made of what’s in a MX, you’ll see what we’re on about.

Each component molecule is in precise ratios. Every nanogram matters. Miniscule amounts of some of the most potent molecules on earth by weight drive the end result. We never follow phero industry fads. We aim for **least** effective dose of molecules. Works quite well. Men who have used TUTH, which has only 2.5 mcg per spray (and some steering bits along with androstenone), see that not much steering or androst. is req. for results.

So adding even a fraction of an outside component changes the lot. Sometimes for the better, other times not.

It’s a bit of a laugh to us in planning MX releases how clients could not get enough [MX200](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/mx200/) and 203 and all that lot. Some of this technology we started near to 15 years ago.

Now some seem to think the MX with such delicate balance mustn’t work unless we drop tonnes of molecule into it. Be that as it may, we’ll not do that. We’ll stick with what works.

Products such as A314 needn’t have much androst. to be effective. Neither should men shun TAL or TAH as steering components.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/questions-on-testing-a-few-of-the-new-mx-packs/63670)._
