# Recent backgrounder on phero research history

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/recent-backgrounder-on-phero-research-history/67323>\
**Category:** Studies & Abstracts\
**Created:** [August 14, 2017, 9:59am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/recent-backgrounder-on-phero-research-history/67323 "2017-08-14T09:59:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vanadium](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/c4cdca/32.png) [@vanadium](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/vanadium)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2017, 9:59am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/recent-backgrounder-on-phero-research-history/67323/1 "2017-08-14T09:59:17Z")

</div>

I’ve been meaning to post this 2016 article for a while, but I got busy and forgot. Longtime members may be aware of much of this, including various incidents, but I thought It was a nice background review.

“What Will It Take To Find a Human [Pheromone](https://a314.com/shop/)?”  
ACS Cent Sci. 2016 Oct 26; 2(10): 678?681. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00306

PUBLIC link to full text: [What Will It Take To Find a Human Pheromone? - PMC](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084077/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CelticPrince](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/celticprince/32/397_2.png) [@CelticPrince](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/CelticPrince)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2017, 8:42pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/recent-backgrounder-on-phero-research-history/67323/2 "2017-10-03T20:42:49Z")

</div>

Interesting article. Proof positive would be nice, but I’m already convinced. On the down side, proof might get a whole lot more people looking at “Our thing”…