# Reporting standards for men: detailed reports, and what still needs testing

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/reporting-standards-for-men-detailed-reports-and-what-still-needs-testing/49123>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [March 3, 2011, 1:22am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/reporting-standards-for-men-detailed-reports-and-what-still-needs-testing/49123 "2011-03-03T01:22:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Sebastian](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/john_sebastian/32/1060_2.png) [@John\_Sebastian](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/John_Sebastian)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2011, 4:24pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/reporting-standards-for-men-detailed-reports-and-what-still-needs-testing/49123/7 "2011-03-03T16:24:30Z")

</div>

> [@Steve](#):
>
> Just to be clear though, there’s no particular way to report. It’s what makes PheroTalk so active and amazing is that we all have various styles of reporting and weaving our stories. I’ve always looked for reports that include as much information as possible about what you used, in what context, how much, any variables. My reports are vastly different from someone like the Smellymen’s reports, but they both serve the same worth. One is not better than the other. It’s about individual uniqueness and who you are that makes PheroTalk such a great site.
> 
> Keep reporting guys 🙂

Correct, its not the output or where you go - its more about the order that things are tested in.

For example:

Timmy buys some [MX297](https://a314.com/product/mx297/), P96, and Ammo. He decides he’s going to be awesome and report on MX297.

However what happens is that he goes with 3 sprays of MX297, 2 Sprays of P96, and then 1 spray of Ammo.

What ends up happening is that the data he provides has no baseline. We don’t know what happens with any of those items and his situation. What we have is a mix up of indiscernible affects.

* * *

To be clear, thats mostly what I’m talking about in this section. We end up getting no data on MX297 or P96 because Ammo was thrown in or he started with a lot of sprays of something that could easily work with 1 or 2.

What would be better would be: Timmy tests MX297. Then tests P96. Then if he feels they’d go together well he could start testing them together. But what we need is you to test the experiment we provided. If Harris wanted the extra molecule in the baseline, it’d be there. Do we get good data from your mixes? YES! In fact we love it, however we still need that baseline or we don’t know what separates your mix from the original products.

I’m not talking about the straight format or the situation you test in.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/reporting-standards-for-men-detailed-reports-and-what-still-needs-testing/49123)._