# Research Oriented Pheromones Description + Product Value / Ingredient Guide **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 12, 2010, 7:36am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557 "2010-10-12T07:36:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 15
**Author:** ![P51Mustang](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/p51mustang/32/1266_2.png) [@P51Mustang](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/P51Mustang)\ **Post date:** [October 12, 2010, 5:17pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557/15 "2010-10-12T17:17:40Z")
> [@Steve](#): > > I also want to say that yes the effort put forward is great and appreciated, but all of these are for ADVANCED users and not just some. They are individual molecules and a user should get a FIRM grip on the instant lines before attempting to use a single molecule. Saying Rone is for alpha status is one thing, but how does the user achieve alpha status? At what level? At what Mcg? Does it need to be mixed? How exactly do you mix it? That’s where the main issue arises actually is that each user is different and each user will experience a different reaction. > > A 14 year old boy will not get an ALPHA status vibe off Rone, more likely he will get a "this does not compute OD vibe and then turn away from mones because in effect they did work, but only the wrong way. Essentially what I am saying is that while the list is well intended what Androtics encourages is that each user should go about testing each product with a “clean slate.” What we want as a company is that each person looking to test a molecule goes about it without pre-conceived notions of what it did for another person. > > I’ve read about members suggesting that other members break open bottles and start mixing or diluting. Most members here, even the more advanced users, think that breaking open a bottle and adding alcohol to it will dilute it. What you are essentially doing is adding alcohol to the bottle and basically that much alcohol to a molecule is actually damaging the molecule. I wish I was a scientist and could explain this better, but I’m not sure how to. I can tell you that you are diluting but not really the molecule. > > With that the effort put into this was brilliant and much appreciated. We have been asked countless times to make a guide or something similar and our reply has always been that it does not serve our community the way it is intended. Snook wrote one, RadMan wrote one and many others, but I can only think of those two right now. Again the effort is appreciated but you are essentially suggesting to our members to base their results on what you have written and encouraging them to mix in bottle, rather than on skin. These are completely opposite of what Androtics stands for, not to mention encouraging members to buy a potentially harmful chemical that makes men depressed. Its actually on your sig too > [@Your Skin is a Pheromone Mixing Canvas](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/your-skin-is-a-pheromone-mixing-canvas/34388): > > July 24th, 2009, 02:01 PM In the late 90s, with Erox advertising heavily on the radio, I first tried these products. I had always written off pheromones as much as I would astrology (bad astrology from carnies, anyway), but I figured if they were spending so much to advertise such a product, it might be worth a shot. And hey, it’s even available in normal department stores. I don’t have to call a 900# or go to a strange, smelly sex shop or anything fishy. So I tried the product. Did smashingly… --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557)._