# Research Oriented Pheromones Description + Product Value / Ingredient Guide

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [October 12, 2010, 7:36am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557 "2010-10-12T07:36:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2010, 6:36pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557/27 "2010-10-12T18:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@ruffinracin121](#):
>
> Oh, I see how I may have been unclear. Thats actually not my intention at all. I’m not even personally trying to mix my own stuff, with the exception of A-1, and I realize “layering” instead of “mixing” is a much better option since you can ultimately end up with a mixture that you arent satisfied with.
> 
> The reasons I listed out each pheromones reported results were so that the instant line could be better analyzed. I completely stand behind the belief that Androtics knows a lot more than we do, so their mixtures are top notch. However, the way my mind works, I like to know what is in each product and what those ingredients are reported to do. I never intended to sway people to go out and start using the experimone line without them having some significant experience under their belt. It was more of a “this guide should help you predict what these products will do,” kind of thing. Does that make sense? I’m sorry if I was unclear.

Oh I know your intentions were admirable and you should be commended. The effort shows just how much you learned in such a short period. I’m not knocking you in any way, I’m just explaining to you and other members why these types of lists will never become sticky and how they actually impede the research of the forum.

That’s why [Snooks Big Book of Mones](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-snooks-big-book-o-pheros-for-rookies/5879) is the only guide in the stickies and it simply covers Instant line products and does not cover anything experimental 😉. Again I must reemphasize that no offense is implied or intended but your guide has some major flaws to it. It’s not a biggie, because if I did one it would have the same flaws. The major flaw is that every single persons results will be different! Every single person needs to do their own research before delving into serious experimenting. The next thing you know some new guy thinks he is an expert because he read a very limited guide, regardless of who wrote it.

I can guarantee you that 90% of the users on this forum THINK they are experienced, but I can assure you many make the [Pheromone](https://a314.com/) Detective squad by the skin of their teeth. We give them that chance to learn. Members like tacitus, PheroQuark and Dancing Joker are the real experts. Pay close notice that I am not on that list. I still have a lot to learn. We all have a lot to learn. A guide will only hinder that learning process.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557)._
