# Research Oriented Pheromones Description + Product Value / Ingredient Guide **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 12, 2010, 7:36am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557 "2010-10-12T07:36:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 36
**Author:** ![jmartinpersonal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/59ef9b/32.png) [@jmartinpersonal](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jmartinpersonal)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2011, 5:32pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557/36 "2011-02-11T17:32:33Z")
> [@Steve](#): > > Especiallysince TAC is the BEST none buffer.😛 > > There are quite a few things missing as far as molecules, but a very good start. However I would say that something that lists a molecule that Androtics considers harmful and then sending the customer to another company to buy that molecule will never become a sticky. The intentions are good, but the reality of it is that it encourages users to go against the androtics mission statement. Actually, does more good than harm…While I don’t know what the Androtics Mission statement is. For skeptics like me, it reinforces my initial opinion that censorship is not occurring, promotes open communication and there-by is an amazing marketing tool !!! Being analytical, I wanted to know the differences between your various product offerings. Some product offerings such as Alpha A314 and Turn Up The Heat, even lack the Technical section found in other product offerings. Does your company mission statement also prohibit you from posting all the “molecules” for all of your product offerings? While I can understand the argument of “trade secrets”, the ability to find new and retain your existing customers, far outweighs. Androtics has by far the best marketing advantage by providing independent consumer information about Pheromones, money back and even double money back; yea some will take advantage, that for skeptics like me mostly part confirm that your “stuff” isn’t just snake oil. In my opinion, perhaps a better response would be to reiterate why Androtic, finds that chemical harmful. Check out my introduction: > [@Chi-Town Says Hey](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/chi-town-says-hey/48796): > > Hi I’m Jeff M and I am quite new to [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/), and new to the site. I’ve first heard of the [androstenone](https://a314.com/product/turn-up-the-heat-tuth/) compound (molecule) waaaaaaaay back in 1992 or so, on TV news programs. With promises of the most from beautiful half naked women guaranteeing me that if I use this product I will get laid. So as the years went by, I would read and hear more and more pheromone stories that the science to replicate the human pheromone was indeed a reality. Then just a few days ago, as I was shopping… --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/research-oriented-pheromones-description-product-value-ingredient-guide/42557)._