# so is mx301-304 the ICM mixes? **URL:** \ **Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [March 24, 2009, 9:33am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377 "2009-03-24T09:33:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mahalo\_silver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@mahalo\_silver](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mahalo_silver)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 9:33am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/1 "2009-03-24T09:33:30Z")
so Steveo hinted that this MX is his ICM series. has this been confirmed? sorry, i cant find the thread with the information. If so, i understand that 302 and 304 r the popular ones, r these the p83 based ICM’s or the -none ones? what r peoples opinions based on the reactions they r getting of what ICM = which mx? ---
**Author:** ![bubblebob](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/bubblebob/32/2120_2.png) [@bubblebob](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bubblebob)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 12:03pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/2 "2009-03-24T12:03:02Z")
I guess at least the MX302 is one of the -none mixes (didn’t give 304 a try yet), but I’m not sure if it’s the one with beta- or with alpha-nol… ---
**Author:** ![Lor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/lor/32/759_2.png) [@Lor](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Lor)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 12:57pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/3 "2009-03-24T12:57:25Z")
been around the MX301,MX302,MX304 and omg, they are _gooooood_. like moths to a candle, you want to be around these mixes. very attractive qualities . have to try the MX303… ---
**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 3:05pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/4 "2009-03-24T15:05:39Z")
Yep ICM they are ---
**Author:** ![marty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/marty/32/714_2.png) [@marty](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/marty)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 3:08pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/5 "2009-03-24T15:08:08Z")
I was fairly certain MX301 was one of the -none ones. I could not tell you anything beyond that. The differences between mixes should be fairly obvious, if you know what you are looking for. ---
**Author:** ![bubblebob](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/bubblebob/32/2120_2.png) [@bubblebob](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/bubblebob)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 3:49pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/6 "2009-03-24T15:49:17Z")
> [@Lor](#): > > been around the MX301,MX302,MX304 and omg, > they are _gooooood_. > > like moths to a candle, you want to be around these mixes. > very attractive qualities . > > have to try the MX303… sooo… which one of these did you like best? ---
**Author:** ![CoolKat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/coolkat/32/501_2.png) [@CoolKat](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/CoolKat)\ **Post date:** [May 17, 2010, 2:44am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/7 "2010-05-17T02:44:06Z")
so MX301 with A1 is good or bad? ---
**Author:** ![Maidenfan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Maidenfan01](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Maidenfan01)\ **Post date:** [May 17, 2010, 3:54am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/8 "2010-05-17T03:54:46Z")
> [@CoolKatDC](#): > > so MX301 with A1 is good or bad? Test it and let us know how it works for you 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![scotties123](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@scotties123](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/scotties123)\ **Post date:** [May 17, 2010, 7:52pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/so-is-mx301-304-the-icm-mixes/27377/9 "2010-05-17T19:52:41Z")
My understanding is that both 301 and 302 have -none. 302 has alpha -nol, and 301 has beta -nol. I’m pretty certain that’s the only difference between the two. I have 302, and ordered 301 so I’ll be doing some side by side comparisons of the two when I get a chance. Unfortunately I won’t get that chance for another month because of school stuff.