# Suggestions for young girl/ older guy :) **URL:** \ **Category:** Women's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\ **Created:** [October 22, 2013, 12:02am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/suggestions-for-young-girl-older-guy/60289 "2013-10-22T00:02:41Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 8
**Author:** ![monesmadedoit](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/monesmadedoit/32/325_2.png) [@monesmadedoit](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/monesmadedoit)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2013, 6:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/suggestions-for-young-girl-older-guy/60289/8 "2013-10-24T06:24:42Z")
> [@tisha23](#): > > What is TAX ??? > > I know many PUA terms but define Fallout for me. > > Tish M. Harris identified the tendency of some women to become posessive of the A314 wearer’s status (i.e., “provider”). This was subsequently born out it user reports over many years. > [@What is the "fallout effect"?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/what-is-the-fallout-effect/41433): > > I read a few posts about a fallout effect. Can someone explain in full detail of what that is? And how [pheromone](https://a314.com/) plays a part in that ? Blackadam71 I use the term Molecule X (TAX) to refer to one of the T Series molecules. At one time, 2X and 4X Honesty were abundant and affordable. The recession lead to dramatic wholesale price increases, making the current 1X 30 mL more expensive than A314. As CTTM2 was dropped from the store, people explored whether 50/50 ANOL/BNOL = IH. They don’t. IH evolved from the 4-molecule to 3-molecule formula it is today. But the undisclosed steering molecule does the heavy lifting. I have tried 3 sprays each IO and IH and 3 sprays Honesty + 20-30 m c g 74. 15 mcg 74 for self FX isn’t impressive. But… 15 mcg 74 + 2.5 m c g Molecule X is exceptional. Even 7.5 / 1.25 is. When IH tripled in price, users asked…and you answered, what they might test as an alternative. The formula above was your suggestion. I have the linked post, but sending it to you via PM seems more circumspect, if my description isn’t clear. In the earliest posts from SwingerMD, a so called “boyfriend effect” became known from [P74](https://pheromonelabs.com/product/p74/). The adjective BF appears over and over, dozens of times with 74–but not with ANOL or BNOL. Sometimes with IH or A314, especially with A1. And a similar effect came about with tests of TAX. Posts from Jasmin tended to underscore these reports…a sort of love molecule. Essentially, it is the bonding quality of P74 and imprinting quality of TAX combined. In the classic Commander Kotov thread > [@Nuclear Fallout: Building a Pheremone WMD](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/nuclear-fallout-building-a-pheremone-wmd/42789): > > Comrades, I have been occupied these last few days perfecting a very special weapon in the Great Pheremone Arms Race. While members of this forum continue to brew mixes for meeting and attracting fine young ladies in social settings, I have taken it upon myself to pursure a slightly different kind of mix. Something catering to the less, shall we say, “sportsman like” sentimentality? A brew not meant to be wielded by soldiers on the front lines, storming bars and classrooms to chalk up a wanton … A314, P74 and IH ring true. But BNOL is no substitute. Neither is ANOL. These two lack the steering power of TAX. When you proferred the formula above as a testing alternative to IH, few bothered to pursue it. **However, you are correct**. My further tests found ANOL and BNOL very good for their traditional communication value, but redundant for the alleged fallout effect. 25 mcg BNOL with 2.5 or more TAX just didn’t elicit bonding, whereas **P74 alone could**. Essentially, P74 does the bonding, but X makes it photographic and unforgettable. After an absence, it creates the yearning effect. I bookmarked dozens of post links. I can find no substantial reports that BNOL will aid this crush (I know women tend to be dismissive of this word as somewhat juvenile) or whatever effect, although straight BNOL does enhance partner communication in established LTR, I feel. Depressive A1 effects are minor but real, so I leave that variable aside for now. My reason for the TAX moniker is that your 4-molecule formula is every bit the alternative to 2 sprays IH (only one dose of the formula = I H 2 sprays). Thus, I don’t overtly post the molecule’s name. I find evidence that 74/TAX is viable, unisex bonding combo. Being 80% P74, it should be affordable for regular use and perhaps a viable consumer item. I don’t know that my synonym “TAX” is entirely necessary, except to not needlessly comprise the value of IH as a consumer staple. --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/suggestions-for-young-girl-older-guy/60289)._