# The Mharris files: why A314's status boost brings willing cooperation

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183>\
**Category:** Consumer Products Combos\
**Created:** [May 22, 2006, 4:10am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183 "2006-05-22T04:10:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2006, 4:10am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/1 "2006-05-22T04:10:30Z")

</div>

**You may view and post in the original thread here:** [https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files/370](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files/370)

**Sowwy, I only collected what “I” could understand. I’ll be glad when Mad Scientist Tacitus’ work is M&M-friendly … his works just sounds right! Tease!**

**A314:** Short of wearing an Armani suit, a gold watch, and shoes made out of exotic animals, I know of nothing that communicates higher value faster than A314.

In a way, I don’t actually like the amount of status that A314 brings. People treat you like you’re better than them – and I don’t think that’s in tune reality.

Now while I don’t necessarily like being put on a pedestal, I do like the amount of COOPERATION the status change brings. Almost anything I ask for, I’ll get with A314… and people tend to cooperate with you _happily_, not begrudgingly or with secret disdain.

It also gives me incredible access to others. I’ve been able to meet all the key people I’ve wanted to with it.

A314 + a little self volition = some incredible personal power.

**A314:IS:** Shine and A314 usually both draw women closer.

Shine, in particular, reduces personal boundaries. Reduces “personal space”. Walking side by side with female friends, they’ll start walking right into me.

\*\*AMMUNITION: \*\*For just attention, Ammo works nicely – great attention with few negatives (I’m not the kind of person that feels the negatives of high androstenone] are worth it – I have enough social skill to generate interest with a friendlier pheromonal approach). I’ve mostly tested Ammo for this aspect.

Ammunition’s effects would be most similar to AE’s. Recently, it was described as AE like by one user, but with a head turning element.

It’s also gone through a little as yet unnanounced upgrade recently, as well (it now has 4 pheromones instead of 3, and double the alpha androstenol). I want to gradually expand the scope of the mix, while keeping it sexual in nature.

Most people love the cologne, but some don’t.

**CTTM MIX 2:** I’ve noticed sort of eery sexual attention (or maybe just: too much attention) from too-young females with CTTM Mix 2 (which is like an even blend of IO] and IH without all the little mods), but it doesn’t seem like I’ve seen the same thing from women in my target age.

I’ve personally seen jaw dropping and subsequent from younger women (some of questionable legal age) with CTTM Mix 2. Not expected whatsoever. In fact, if I didn’t see it myself, I wouldn’t have believed it.

CTTM M2 is very simple. It’s almost a completely even mix of ANOL to BNOL.

It’s mixes 3 through 8 of CTTM that go crazier on the ratios.

**IFM:IO:IS:** Much to my surprise, I’ve had women _vigorously_ initiate conversations with me using IO], Shine and IFM. Sometimes one after the other. (with the first one, you get a social proof element that encourages other women to vie for your attention)

Now this is important: Even though women will sometimes initiate with you, push that out of your head. Don’t aim for that – that’s a weak position to come from. Men play the biological role of initiators, and if you’re not doing that, you’re going to be working against what you’re building with pheromones.

Bottom line: You need to get some game.

**IFM:IS:** For all my talk about the need for men to initiate, I’ve actually had women _approach me_ with a combinations that use Instant Shine] and [Instant Female Magic](https://a314.com/product/instant-female-magic/), I’m “ashamed” to say.

I almost don’t want to post about that, because as a man if you EXPECT women to initiate, then you’ll give off the “wrong vibe” and nobody will.

I will say that most strong responses from female strangers in an intimate environment recently have involved from around 5 sprays of IFM] to the back of the neck, and usually around 3 sprays of Shine to the front. The rest of my mix changes, but those 2 are definitely keys to closing distances.

I do get unrequested intimacy, whenever I’m in close proximity with those 2.

**IFM:IO/CTTM M2/SPACELAND:** If you really want women to initiate with no effort on your part whatsoever, IFM] sometimes does the trick when matched with a predominately alpha nol mix such as Instant Openness, CTTM M2, Spaceland, etc.

**IH:** Instant Honesty]. It’s the friendship accelerator. You make deep bonds fast with strangers, and even deepen the connections you have with people you’ve known for years.

**IH:IS:** Looks like Instant Honesty] in combo with Shine can also generate some forwardness.

**IO:** Instant Openness] I feel, lives more up to the communication reputation of anol, and less to the giggly side of the things (although it still has great “feel good” element to it)

**IO:IS:** Openness and Shine – those two tend to bring out a wacky, fun friendliness.

You can get a nice flirty response with equal parts Instant Openness] and Shine, almost anywhere, from anyone.

**IS:** I know Shine is a virtual miracle for _decreasing_ personal space. People invade your space so automatically, it’s like you’re a human magnet.

“Flesh on flesh, and hey, we haven’t even introduced ourselves yet!”

**ISEXINESS:** ISEXINESS has 8 pheromones, and 7 female scent components. About 2 years of work went into this. It’s really the first revolutionary pheromone product for women since Athena.

Mix A is more forward, strong, sort of like a noninsane version of Angelina Jolie.

B is more gushy, more Playboy bunny like.

Oh, and the product doesn’t have TAA yet. However, it’s inclusion is being planned.

**NOLS:** Out of the androstenols, most people prefer more alpha-nol for “dates”, than beta-nols. Dates being sort of care-free fun, light activities.

Beta-nol is more the stuff of relationships… mental bonding. You’ll learn a lot about each other when you wear it, but necessarily physically.

Instant Openness has more than either alpha-nol or beta-nol, and will still make for non-stop chattiness once you get the ball rolling. The quantity is still there. The big difference between IO and pure alpha-nol is the \*quality \*of communication.

It’s a more communication oriented pheromone mixture than pure alpha-nol, which is more on the silly side of things.

I view pure alpha-nol as a fun special effect (that’s why I have high anol in fun products such as “Spaceland” and “Social Fabric Softener”), whereas IO is more useful in more contexts, such as at work or when meeting people. It’s a nice social catalyst.

Some Asians seem to react almost sexually to BOTH alpha and beta-nol, in a way that exceeds the impact you see on most races (young women of almost any race, though, seem to have an almost sexual reaction to beta-nol, too - I’ve seen alpha/beta-nol mixes such as Come Talk To Me v2 create some startlingly unexpected results on younger women).

**PMX 101:** I’ve only used it on it’s own… Granted, I do have “formulator’s OD” but I did get to try it once after several days of not being exposed to pheromones at all.

I’ll say this: If my experiences are any indication, then if you’re an attention whore, you’ll _love_ it!

I don’t think I’ve ever counted as much “hit” (attention-wise) as I have with this mix.

The only downside is that I didn’t particular how I felt on it, as it’s a bit too strong for my preferences for daily use. I would probably add some A314, Shine and maybe even estratetraenol for my own psychological comfort (all of which might dilute it’s attention getting effects - so beware!).

However, I would find myself using it on weekends, or especially in party cities, like Miami.

**PMX 101:** Futurist’s mix (101) has given me _extreme_ attention the times I’ve tried. It’s sort of the double barrel shotgun approach strength-wise, and uses some of our newer technology. This wouldn’t be a daily wear product for me, per se, due to my temperament… but for nighttime or weekend? Boom!!

If you really want women to initiate with no effort on your part whatsoever, IFM, sometimes does the trick when matched with a predominately alpha nol mix such as Instant Openness, CTTM M2, Spaceland, etc.

**TAL:** _As a male in his late 20s, I’ve been playing with TAL (5 mcg/spray bottle) and definitely like the results. Does seem to make people, both men and women, mostly very friendly with me. You do need some A314 or a -None-strong-product to add a bit to the respect factor and I guess the latter for more sexual tension. I have had some good and ‘fun’ conversations with a female workmate and housemate both around my age wearing TAL and my regular A314/WAGG/IO/IS combo._

_As far as effects on me, TAL doesn’t have the confidence-enhancing effects of TAA. On the other hand, I do seem to be more friendly and social on it (reminds me of A-Nol in that way)…_

_I can see that TAL does have quite a positive effect on females and I would love to see what it does with IFM in female-only company…_

I think you’re remotely boosting a woman’s confidence wearing TAL, and thus, their expressiveness. Bringing them out, and perhaps even “Bringing out the best in them” when used in a good mix.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![examine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/examine/32/1665_2.png) [@examine](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/examine)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2006, 5:27am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/2 "2006-05-22T05:27:25Z")

</div>

very good post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Socrates](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@Socrates](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Socrates)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2006, 9:26am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/3 "2006-05-22T09:26:13Z")

</div>

Yes great work M&M (Mobes?). MHarris really knows his stuff as we can see here - the guy is wise… a newbie should skip the forum mubo jumbo and read his posts one by one.

Visionary

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dakota](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/dakota/32/951_2.png) [@Dakota](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Dakota)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2006, 11:01am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/4 "2006-05-22T11:01:34Z")

</div>

> [@M&M](#):
>
> I’ve personally seen jaw dropping and subsequent from younger women (some of questionable legal age) with CTTM Mix 2.

I can see the final release product name now … ‘Instant Arrest’ 😃

On a serious note, thank you for taking the time to compile that post. I personally found it very useful.

🆒

D.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2006, 1:02pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/5 "2006-05-22T13:02:44Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Yes great work M&M (Mobes?). MHarris really knows his stuff as we can see here - the guy is wise… **a newbie should skip the forum mubo jumbo and read his posts one by one**.

Mobes, I … and I agree!

I thought this would give a better light to those newbies and myself, who are in search of …

Annnnnd that IFM and TAL sounds very interesting … could be dangerously wonderful for the brave male that attempts it!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Socrates](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3bc359/32.png) [@Socrates](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Socrates)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2006, 8:21am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/6 "2006-05-23T08:21:10Z")

</div>

> [@M&M](#):
>
> Annnnnd, Visionary, that IFM and TAL sounds very interesting … could be dangerously wonderful for the brave male that attempts it!

M&M (and Mobes too lol)  
I have tried the IFM/TAL combo once. It sound perfect on paper, but when I tried it, the girl was nice to me but was stressed (she is the moody type anyway so the mones probably reduced the stress a bit but not completely by any stretch). Anyway I sometimes felt wearing too much TAL would get girls to talk a lot and be more confident, but it did not really establish a connection like Alpha and Beta-Nol do. Maybe a combo of CTTM-M2 (fragranced 50% Alpha and 50% Beta-Nol), TAL, and IFM would work wonders?

Visionary

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tacitus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@tacitus](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tacitus)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2006, 1:40pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/7 "2006-05-23T13:40:37Z")

</div>

ah so, stressed ? You don’t need much TAL a’tall if it is in a male phero mix … TAL is among the energizer [pheromones](https://pheromonelabs.com/shop/) … it isn’t a romanticizer… in some aspects the energizers are anti-romantic… so you can get that “pulling two directions at once” business like you will have with TAC and TAA together… the stressor may be her brain feeling tugged in both an outspoken energized mindset AND a comfy relational mindset… ofter, too, you will observe a stress response when the receiver person has responses that are unfamiliar, or unfamiliar within the context … the mind, to use a bad metaphor, is trying to put a square peg into a round hole, it can’t figure out ( on a background, unconscious process level ) how to **frame** the social information, so it shifts to an _unfamiliarity_ response… like a kid who is going to her first day at school… it IS unfamiliar, unsettling…there can be some tensions

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catlord17](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f9ae1b/32.png) [@catlord17](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/catlord17)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2006, 6:24am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/8 "2006-05-24T06:24:11Z")

</div>

Many thanks for the compilation. I’d found most of these, but some of them had eluded me.

I’m curious… at what doses did the attention from the young ones show up? Is there some specific dosage range to tread carefully with?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tacitus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@tacitus](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tacitus)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2006, 2:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/9 "2006-05-24T14:07:46Z")

</div>

> [@catlord17](#):
>
> I’m curious… at what doses did the attention from the young ones show up?

This very much depends on how you define **attention**. Each person, young or old, has a distinct psychology, a distinct endocinology, hence a distinct response.

My preferences at the beginning are “up and clear headed communication” … I’m not aiming for heavy duty limbic states… I want the forebrain engaged…

Often people have the hardest time getting their thoughts out the door… worse now that we live in an age of dysfunctional communication skill teaching… young ‘uns haven’t had the necessary early contact with richly communicative family systems, so they need to be jolted out of a state of culturally induced autism. You wouldn’t believe how oafish and socially clueless so many kids are today… nice kids too, good intentions, they may know many facts about the world, but they don’t know the structure of conversational arts and there is no mechanism in place to teach them, other than maybe watching their compatriots on one of the Real World spinoffs… sources of social models ? … Dog The Bounty Hunter ? Cops ? Survivor ? Paris Hilton ? … Give me a freakin’ break…

Given that precondition and maybe if you want to keep things simple, try IO and 30 mu of p78 , and 30 mu of TAA … under a layer of clothing to smooth out the diffusion… the wools , btw are exceptional at binding and releasing organic molecules, in some ways superior to leather… so you could take a fine spun merino wool sweater, spray it with a stronger dose, put it ina gallon sixed ziploc bag, squeeze the air out, let it absorb for 24 hours, then wear it… wool or leather absorbants are excellent…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tacitus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@tacitus](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/tacitus)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2006, 3:04pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mharris-files-why-a314s-status-boost-brings-willing-cooperation/23183/10 "2006-05-24T15:04:19Z")

</div>

For Whatever It Is Worth… and you wonder why communication can be an effort ?

**How to produce a generation of social morons 101** 🆒 🆒 🆒

WASHINGTON - One mother stopped watching “ER” reruns when her preschooler tried to give her little brother CPR. Another mom laughed that her 15-month-old sang the McDonald’s jingle — “ba, ba, boppa, ba” — every time they drove past the golden arches.

One-third of the nation’s youngest children — babies through age 6 — live in homes where the television is on almost all the time, says a study that highlights the immense disconnect between what pediatricians advise and what parents allow.

TV in the bedroom is not even that rare for the littlest tots anymore. Almost one child in five under 2 has a set, even though the American Academy of Pediatrics advises against any TV watching at that age.

Eight in 10 children younger than 6 watch TV, play video games or use the computer on a typical day. They average about two hours of screen time, compared with 48 minutes when they are being read to, the Kaiser Family Foundation concludes in a study released Wednesday.  
The number of youngsters glued to the screen has not changed much since the foundation’s first report on the topic in 2003.

But in this follow-up, Kaiser asked parents — in a survey and in focus-group sessions — why they and their children use TV and other electronic media the way they do.  
“I had this sense of kids clamoring to use media and parents trying to keep their finger in the dam,” lead researcher Victoria Rideout said. “I found that not to be a very accurate picture in most cases.”  
Instead, a generation of parents raised on TV is largely encouraging the early use of television, video games and computers by their own children, often starting in infancy.

These parents say TV teaches how to share and the ABCs when they do not have the time. Television provides time for parents to cook or take a shower. They use screen time as a reward or, paradoxically, to help kids wind down at bedtime.

“There’s this enthusiasm and tremendous lack of concern” about media use, Rideout said.  
“It’s just background noise,” said one Colorado woman who has a preschooler and who keeps the TV on most of the day. The study did not identify people in the focus group by name.  
Where some parents limited scary shows or video games, others found youngsters unfazed. “It’s something gory, but it doesn’t seem to bother her,” said a California mother whose toddler joined her on the couch for “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.”

**Can’t get by without it?**  
Despite studies that link bedroom TVs to kids’ sleep problems, the most common reason cited for giving children their own set was that it freed up other TVs so parents or their other children could watch their shows.  
The report by the California-based foundation, which analyzes health care issues, comes at a time of great debate about the impact of TV and other multimedia on youngsters. Just last week, specialists called together by the National Institutes of Health urged more research on how electronic media affect children at different ages.  
Those specialists sigh at the notion that parents could not get by without TV.

“People have made dinner for millenia, but we’ve only had television for 50 years,” said Dr. Dimitri Christakas of the University of Washington. “Television’s not inherently good or bad. … The real goal now has to be not to de-technologize childhood, but how to optimize children’s experiences” with it.

The pediatrics group recommends no TV or other electronic media for kids younger than 2 — advice that just 26 percent of parents followed, Kaiser found — and no more than two hours of total “screen time” daily for older children.

The organization is not anti-TV, said Dr. Daniel Broughton of the Mayo Clinic, an academy member who co-wrote the recommendations. But before age 2 is time of the brain’s most rapid development, and interaction — the live give-and-take that TV cannot provide — is crucial during that period, he said.  
Some studies also link TV watching at younger ages to youngsters’ attention disorders.

After a child reaches 2, the idea is to balance a little TV with riding bikes, playing with friends, household chores and the other activities of childhood, Broughton said.

“We want parents to watch with their kids,” he added. One reason is that viewing ethnic stereotypes or bad behavior on TV can become instructive, when parents explain why children should not copy what they saw.
