# The Mystery Method on YouTube: does it really work for approaching women?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565>\
**Category:** Lounge\
**Created:** [December 19, 2007, 2:46am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565 "2007-12-19T02:46:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![galydrum](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/galydrum/32/5181_2.png) [@galydrum](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/galydrum)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2008, 12:20am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/22 "2008-05-23T00:20:46Z")

</div>

Mystery’s got some good concepts. David DeAngelo is a much more naturalistic approach, since he focuses more on attitude and inner game. Besides which, if you listen to both of them, DD just sounds (not to mention _looks_) like a much more together much more sincere guy. He doesn’t need feather boa peacocking and all that crap. With MM being so formulaic, it can really take some of the fun out of social interactions.

Also, reading Mystery’s stuff (and Style’s too) has totally corrupted my vocabulary. I don’t want to be self-conscious of the fact that I am “Opening a set,” “DHV-ing,” “Kino-pinging,” “AMOG-ing” or “Negging” (though that one is not so bad). I’d rather just drop all the esoteric PUA jargon crap and have some cocky fun. Sure the vocab is kinda convenient sometimes, but it sort of puts you in a weird frame of mind.

Mystery breaks things down and over-analyzes things way too much for my tastes. DD’s material (it’s much more holistic, so I wouldn’t even call it a method) is much more natural, and ultimately more profound. I don’t buy into all of it, of course. The psychological causes he cites sometimes leave me skeptical, but in general the system makes sense and doesn’t make you feel like a PUA robot.

Oh yeah. And Mystery Method is specifically designed to pick up random chicks (“full close” is the only real close), which is something not every guy is even interested in. DeAngelo’s approach can be used in many different situations and by people of a variety of moral and religious commitments. You can follow DD’s general approach and not feel like you are living in a scene from _School for Scoundrels_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 2:38am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/23 "2008-05-28T02:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@DssMaster](#):
>
> Yo what happened to the post I put here yesterday? Who and why was it deleted?

I deleted it because Mystery, Style, David D, Blitz, Thundercat, Mehow, and quite a few others are friends of mine. Not to mention the site advocates stealing from these guys.

I’m sure you meant no harm, but these guys worked hard for what they have.🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![galydrum](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/galydrum/32/5181_2.png) [@galydrum](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/galydrum)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 4:45am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/24 "2008-05-28T04:45:54Z")

</div>

> [@SteveO](#):
>
> Mystery, Style, David D, Blitz, Thundercat, Mehow, and quite a few others are friends of mine.

That’s very interesting. Out of curiosity, what do they think of the use of pheros? Have you discussed it with them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 3:22pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/25 "2008-05-28T15:22:06Z")

</div>

> [@galydrum](#):
>
> That’s very interesting. Out of curiosity, what do they think of the use of pheros? Have you discussed it with them?

No discussions about [pheromones](https://a314.com/). I leave that to the phero-mistress Jasmosis. I have been focusing on something else for Androtics which puts me in direct contact with these guys.😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![galydrum](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/galydrum/32/5181_2.png) [@galydrum](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/galydrum)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 5:28pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/26 "2008-05-28T17:28:26Z")

</div>

> [@SteveO](#):
>
> No discussions about pheromones. I leave that to the phero-mistress Jasmosis. I have been focusing on something else for Androtics which puts me in direct contact with these guys.😃

Whoa, wait a minute . . . Androtics produces something other than pheros? Any hints?🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@SteveO](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/SteveO)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 6:07pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565/27 "2008-05-28T18:07:48Z")

</div>

I’ve already given you a hint 😛

[Previous page](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-mystery-method-on-youtube-does-it-really-work-for-approaching-women/7565.md?page=1)
