# The OFFICIAL MX351 Discussion Thread

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx351-discussion-thread/61955>\
**Category:** MX Test Results\
**Created:** [October 20, 2009, 6:58pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx351-discussion-thread/61955 "2009-10-20T18:58:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WildFlower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/wildflower/32/1260_2.png) [@WildFlower](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/WildFlower)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2010, 9:00pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx351-discussion-thread/61955/21 "2010-09-30T21:00:13Z")

</div>

> [@WildFlower's Pheromone Experiences.](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/wildflowers-pheromone-experiences/13914/440):
>
> Hey WF
> 
> I got a couple of questions about MX351,
> 
> I really liked it on the very brief testing I did.
> 
> Do you know if they’re going to re release your mix, or did you ever release the formula?

I don’t know if they will be releasing it again. Is MX351 the different scented version of MX327? that mix was predominantly b-nol heavy mixed at a nice, 4:1 ratio, with p74. They where the two main molecules with a few other ‘steerer’s’. Simple as that. Great with rone; not so great with anone. p74 really enhances b-nol I find.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx351-discussion-thread/61955)._