# The OFFICIAL MX353 Discussion Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** MX Test Results\ **Created:** [November 5, 2009, 5:15pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx353-discussion-thread/61472 "2009-11-05T17:15:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 157
**Author:** ![JohnnyHard](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/johnnyhard/32/1753_2.png) [@JohnnyHard](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/JohnnyHard)\ **Post date:** [April 16, 2010, 4:14pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx353-discussion-thread/61472/157 "2010-04-16T16:14:42Z")
> [@MX353 + Asians?](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx353-asians/37323/6): > > I’ve used both before. Still have a few bottles of MX292 left. IMO MX353 isn’t nearly as effective as MX292 in all respects. Scent wise, I’ve had Asians comment on how bad it smelled for MX353 whereas the same person loved MX292. I think there’s a tweak to MX353 besides the scent cause it doesn’t feel like MX292. **It has the same amount of -none as TUTH.** You can pretty much figure out or guess most of the formula in the musings on MX292 thread. Overall, MX292 is one of my favorite products. It seems to work with pretty much everyone and it mixes/layers well with other pheros. 2,5 mcg none per spray, sure? That’s very low… I test MX353 one time and the smell is really bad… --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-official-mx353-discussion-thread/61472)._