# The Under Reported, Under Appreciated MX178

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-under-reported-under-appreciated-mx178/33566>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [October 25, 2009, 7:01am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-under-reported-under-appreciated-mx178/33566 "2009-10-25T07:01:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jessejester](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/jessejester/32/1683_2.png) [@jessejester](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/jessejester)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2009, 5:38am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-under-reported-under-appreciated-mx178/33566/8 "2009-10-28T05:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@Eldros](#):
>
> Are you sure its the mx178? you seem to be adding a lot of other things to your mix. I had also purchased the mx177/mx178 combo a few year back, but I didn’t notice much from it.

Yes I am sure it is 178. i did a good amount of testing with it by itself and still had good responses. I had really good responses with just adding B-nol to it. The ones I posted were the best of the best. The thing is, I feel that 178 does not have a direction, its incomplete. The other pheros I added seemed to give it eiyher a sexual or social vibe.

---

_[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/the-under-reported-under-appreciated-mx178/33566)._