# Tigerlilly's Reports **URL:** \ **Category:** Women's Journals\ **Created:** [March 2, 2009, 7:48pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/tigerlillys-reports/26666 "2009-03-02T19:48:32Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 123
**Author:** ![diane999](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/diane999/32/1110_2.png) [@diane999](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/diane999)\ **Post date:** [April 21, 2009, 1:54am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/tigerlillys-reports/26666/123 "2009-04-21T01:54:03Z")
> [@Tigerlilly](#): > > Haha - that was my mix for the conference. I met this guy there. He was actually helping me to set it up and put it on. That’s how we met. > > Those are the only pheros he’s been around. > > I would _never_ wear p87 around someone I wanted emotional depth with. > > He happened to be a social contact met while wearing a heavy duty work phero mix. > > i was unaware that TAA caused mental distance. I have read your reports of p74 giving you an observer effect. I have not noticed that in myself, but I keep it in my notes as a potential reactive effect for others. Ah… gotcha! The mental distance of TAA isn’t much talked about on the board. It is something I’ve noticed when I tried to use it in my sensual mixes. And I’ve had that property confirmed by Mike Harris. Mike described it as an attention grabber, shallow and lacking in depth, and causing mental distance. It’s great for getting attention, not so great for depth. I think social butterfly in the sunshine when I think of TAA. Diane --- _[View the full topic](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/tigerlillys-reports/26666)._