# Was MX347 the original A314 a/b spray?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [April 8, 2016, 10:12am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850 "2016-04-08T10:12:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ScentHound](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/scenthound/32/1840_2.png) [@ScentHound](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ScentHound)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 10:12am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/1 "2016-04-08T10:12:03Z")

</div>

Found this thread describing MX347:

[MX347 Fallout...](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/mx347-fallout/41247)

Sounds like it was a very hard-hitting mix with fast effects.

Did MX347 evolve into the [A314 spray](https://a314.com/product/a314-classic-spray/) versions and if not, is there any chance of it making a re-appearance?

It sounds like a very interesting mix! 😃

Cheers,

ScentHound.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 10:23am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/2 "2016-04-08T10:23:19Z")

</div>

Yes, it was the prototype for [A314 spray](https://a314.com/product/a314-classic-spray/) and yes, it was excellent although it did tend to be a bit heavy going compared to even the A314 oil of the time.

With the right woman - i.e. tuned into very mature status, it could be superb and very fast indeed. Although fallout did still take some time to develop fully.

I’d certainly welcome its return. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Conjurator](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/conjurator/32/410_2.png) [@Conjurator](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Conjurator)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 10:54am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/3 "2016-04-08T10:54:49Z")

</div>

There are a few missing-in-action MXs that seemed really good. It’s sad so many of them disappeared without a trace.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 11:21am UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/4 "2016-04-08T11:21:36Z")

</div>

The ones I miss most are MX301 and the aforementioned MX347. 301 in particular was eminently steerable/adaptable with a range of products/putatives and I notice the recipe released after its demise also seems to have been removed.

Quite a few others were released though, so you can have a go at recreating them yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ScentHound](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/scenthound/32/1840_2.png) [@ScentHound](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ScentHound)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 5:44pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/5 "2016-04-08T17:44:05Z")

</div>

Thanks Mobo, it’s good to have my suspicion confirmed 😉

Was MX301 a social, a status or a sexual type of mix?

Cheers, SH

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mobocaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c2a13f/32.png) [@mobocaster](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/mobocaster)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 6:04pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/was-mx347-the-original-a314-a-b-spray/65850/6 "2016-04-08T18:04:03Z")

</div>

Definitely a sexual but with excellent connection/attraction properties as well. IIRC it was [P93](https://a314.com/product/p93/) and None-based.