# Which is better to communicate sexual intent?

**URL:** <https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205>\
**Category:** Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports\
**Created:** [October 29, 2008, 3:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205 "2008-10-29T15:09:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seraphim54](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/seraphim54/32/514_2.png) [@Seraphim54](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Seraphim54)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 3:09pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/1 "2008-10-29T15:09:02Z")

</div>

Turn up the Heat or [Ammo](https://a314.com/product/ammo/)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ntk23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/65b543/32.png) [@ntk23](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/ntk23)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 4:46pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/2 "2008-10-29T16:46:22Z")

</div>

Turn up the Heat is. The -none in Ammo is buffered by other pheros, whereas… well I think there are some secret other ingredients in TUTH too, but it is designed as a full-on -none hit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seraphim54](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/seraphim54/32/514_2.png) [@Seraphim54](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Seraphim54)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 4:50pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/3 "2008-10-29T16:50:50Z")

</div>

Thanks bro…what I figured.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![M\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@M\_M](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/M_M)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 5:12pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/4 "2008-10-29T17:12:50Z")

</div>

TUTH is “I’m getting naked!”

AMMO is “I will get naked!” 😮

AMMO is just as sexual … depending on the targets receptors … IF you’d ask me. 🙄

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Seraphim54](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/pheromonetalk.com/seraphim54/32/514_2.png) [@Seraphim54](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Seraphim54)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 5:18pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/5 "2008-10-29T17:18:37Z")

</div>

> [@M\_M](#):
>
> TUTH is “I’m getting naked!”
> 
> AMMO is “I will get naked!” 😮
> 
> AMMO is just as sexual … depending on the targets receptors … IF you’d ask me. 🙄

Oh that IS interesting…thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@Phya](https://pheromonetalk.com/u/Phya)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2008, 5:41pm UTC](https://pheromonetalk.com/t/which-is-better-to-communicate-sexual-intent/22205/6 "2008-10-29T17:41:23Z")

</div>

Seraphim, they will both communicate sexual intent. The question is, which manner of communication will be more effective?

If you have both, it won’t hurt to try them both out and see what you’re looking for. IMO, Ammo is a better product for day to day use, as it is more friendly and sociable than TUTH.

In fact, I’m kinda bored today, I’m considering tossing in a spray of Ammo and some other stuff..