100% (PS) Panty Scorcher : MX331-334 Thread

You should check out my Glamor mix, that is with what is available in the store and the variant I sent to mco is posted as well, works Very well but is high status driven.

did we conclude whether or not the mixes have cops in them?
i didnt read a conclusion on that.

The mix contents are not being given out at this time.

In the 30+ pages from the last thread on PS, and this 6 pages as well.

I believe CL does not want the formula out, nor the exact contents discussed.

It is after all his formula yea?

I’m fine with that. It’s only fair.

By the way, I saw your glamour mix recipe. Good results?

interesting.

i dont think i was asking for the forumula :roll_eyes:,
i think im asking about the addition of a product not produced yet by this company… (or is it?)

thats why the question is a valid one.

Available in the store? Under what MX?

i think he meant that the instant glamor mix can be created with what is currently available in the store.

That is what I ment Jay, mco tried the variant is worked quite well.

Lor, noone has said to confirm whether or not it contains copulins, it was said an early version in the first pages of the original thread did state that, but it was never indicated that any version after that let alone the final version did or did not contain them.

I have not confirmed it as a tester, nor has CL stated that on the forums, nor Amy from the posts I have seen, “which she is not supposed to comment on ingredients of private mixes”.

So asking when he does not want to comment is not valid. No-one knows, and those that do are not allowed to comment either way.

The point is moot really.

i appreciate you speaking on behalf of androtics and catlord, dj.

thank you.

I speak on behalf of no one Lor lol love ya to death but, Address your questions to them, and I will not comment.

I am the only tester commenting, no one else has it in hand.

I am only trying to get the point across for everyone reading this, that this is not a thread to discuss the make up of the formula.

it was for when the mix gets sent out for testers to review it in one place.

Placing questions on a forum asking people who do not know… it really is a moot point.

Sorry Jay I have my info incorrect up there it was not mco who tried it, it was Derf link here: Derf's sociochemical mistakes/ramble/discoveries - #17 by derf

Talking about a variation of a older version of one of my mixes that I am still working on, I will be ejecting the dienone and trying to find a middle ground between A314 and IG.

Hold, on, you guys are now selling one of Catlords crazy mixes?
And I MISSED this? When did this happen?

The ingredients in PS are for me to know. And a select few others. I do not want the contents made public… if I ever do, believe it, I will make them public myself. Some variants of PS may have ingredients that others do not… what ends up “going to market” after testing as an MX will depend on which of the four is most successful.

I’m going to take a break from making mixes for a short time, observe the results people get from the MX pack, and do some testing of new stuff coming out. It ought to be fun to use something different for a bit… after months and months of PS. Even if it does make “interesting” things happen to the girlies… I am sort of playing around with a mix that Happykitsune and I have been discussing, though… should be interesting stuff.

Pete they just released it a few days back.

I would assume none are placebos, and all have some pheros, just different variations

I don’t think Androtics would sell you a product that is a placebo with no pheros in it

Unless they tell you up front one of them is a placebo in the pack, I don’t think that would be good business practices

it seems like they are testing different scents along with different variations, since I noticed two of them have akuto and two have game scent, I will not be trying these out because I will not be touching akuto, i can tolerate neroli and game but not akuto

Placebos without pheromones have their use in testing. They act as a “control” for determining “the placebo effect”, of course. MXs are all about BLIND TESTING. I doubt they’d sell them alone, though.

CatLord, just want to let you I’m going to be disconected from the world for 12 days. I will start testing as soon as I get back and I’ll be writing my findings then.

…Coool…

I appreciate your thoughtfulness in telling me.

Then that is bad business practice IMO, because we are buying products and expect to have some sort of pheros in them, unless they are upfront and honest about it, and i never seen that mentioned anywhere

I understand them not releasing what is in them exact mcg or pheros, but I am not going to spend my hard earned money for possible placebos. You have private testers for that

and if that is what you are telling me is happening I might have to rethink my chances of doing testing from now on especially in this economy where every dollar counts

in fact I am going to contact Steve because this really bothers me, I seriously doubt they do this

denec—Don’t get too hot and bothered by this. :slight_smile: First off, it’s a test pack and not an official release. I’m sure when testing is over, (I hope soon), :slight_smile: then the final product will show up with the ingredients on the label/website for all to see. Just play it cool. :slight_smile: Steve I’m sure has enough on his plate. I’m sure he’ll chime in when the higher ups are off his back. :slight_smile:

Has anyone actually tested it yet?

I think there was a problem with my order. I hit the process order button twice, so I was charged twice. I emailed to have the 2nd payment corrected but now my order doesnt show as shipped with fed ex. I hope by cancling the dup payment they didnt cancel my order :frowning:

Jul 30, 2009 1:47 PM
Shipment information sent to FedEx

Nothing past that.. I am waiting for 9am pst before i can call :frowning: