They are both sexual attraction mixes with social aspects, based on my ICM 1A and 1B mixes. 301 is the 1A which has Beta Androstenol and 1B is 302 which has Alpha Androstenol. Other than that they are the same.
That’s what I thought as well from the published recipes…
ICM 0.25.05aTAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.05bTAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray None 5 mcg per sprayTAC 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.1aTAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray None 5 mcg per sprayTAC 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.1bTAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray
And I’m very curious as a massive P83 fan - would love to add some to these but have held off thinking 302 already had it and i didn’t want to skew my testing…
From my testing perspective I can say yes and with 100% certainty. Anol and I do not mix well, but Bnol and I do. MX301 works where as MX302 does not work very well. That’s how I know.
Its nothing to do with the mix! Its the Anol I am not a fan of. I’m already gregarious so Anol pushes it over the top and I become the clown. Bnol is more centered for me
Ah… I was just curious of your reaction to the Anol. Makes sense whereas the effects are pretty straightforward with it inducing the chattiness etc. Didn’t notice as much self effect but I will be paying more attention to that in the next round of testing =)