301/302 Question..

thanks for clicking my post..

i just want to confirm about this test product..

301 = sexual

302 = social

is it right??

so i don’t need to combine any other social phero when using this?

just 2 spray of 301 and 2 spay of 302?

i am excited to test this phero and report all the results..

thanks..

I found them to have both sexual and socials in 301/302. Search and read the many many reports.

You will have to work to find your sweet spot. I have worn 3 sprays and as much as 6 ( when Steve’s bad influence took over).

They are both sexual attraction mixes with social aspects, based on my ICM 1A and 1B mixes. 301 is the 1A which has Beta Androstenol and 1B is 302 which has Alpha Androstenol. Other than that they are the same.

I thought it was 5b that had the Alpha -nol? 1B replaced the TAC and -none with P83, right?

That’s what I thought as well from the published recipes…

ICM 0.25.05aTAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.05bTAA 4 mcg per sprayAlpha Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray None 5 mcg per sprayTAC 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.1aTAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 MCG PER SPRAYP93 3 mcg per sparyP74 5 mcg per spray None 5 mcg per sprayTAC 5 mcg per spray ICM 0.25.1bTAA 4 mcg per sprayBeta Androstenol 5 mcg per sprayP93 3 mcg per sprayP74 5 mcg per sprayP83 5 mcg per spray

And I’m very curious as a massive P83 fan - would love to add some to these but have held off thinking 302 already had it and i didn’t want to skew my testing…

I was actually planning on testing P83 with MX301 later this week, will let you know how it goes :wink:

Steve, did you forget to mention they kick ass?

Or are you being modest?

I’m Humble :wink:

Well said, sir!

Steve can you clear that up? I thought IB had the p83 and beta in it, no?

You’re right, but those were MX303 and MX304

Good for attracting Asian women? Sexual but social?

Try it and let us know :wink:

So is .05b mx302 Steve?

From my testing perspective I can say yes and with 100% certainty. Anol and I do not mix well, but Bnol and I do. MX301 works where as MX302 does not work very well. That’s how I know.:stuck_out_tongue:

This makes me very much excited to know I have a 301 coming pdq

win!

I meant to say that MX302 does not work for me in the sense of how I want it to work. MX302 works very well for anyone who likes Anol.

It’s the same reason I’m not a fan of spaceland. I can’t get it to work right for me.

could you elaborate on it ‘not working right’?

Does it give you conflicting effects compared to what most people have reported? howso?

I was thinking of picking it up because it seems like it could be some fun to play with.

Its nothing to do with the mix! Its the Anol I am not a fan of. I’m already gregarious so Anol pushes it over the top and I become the clown. Bnol is more centered for me :stuck_out_tongue:

Ah… I was just curious of your reaction to the Anol. Makes sense whereas the effects are pretty straightforward with it inducing the chattiness etc. Didn’t notice as much self effect but I will be paying more attention to that in the next round of testing =)