I’ve been reading some of the reviews of the new A314 UFE. The new spec seems to have improved everything about A314.
Is there any chance that we may see an Ammo UFE or IG UFE?
Can any testers of A314 UFE speculate on how these two might be enhanced by the UFE spec?
I would say MUCH more research would have to be done before that decision will ever be made. So far they are saying there isn’t enough research on the most popular MX’s to consider them for anything except discontinued. With the thousands of reports on MX’s to have them discontinued I’d say we have a snowballs shot in a hot oven to ever see UFE for anything else. Especially considering a very limited amount of people will ever even get to test it.
I’d like to see this process for everything though. UFE is just great and a game changer IMHO
So ultra fine mones work better?
Don’t you think thats a hard question to propose? I mean yeah Steve among the others who have UFE can compare it with REV23 in terms of effectiveness. This “new” way of processing mones is still in its infancy and theres no real way of knowing until we’ve tested it extensively in alcohol based mixes with other molecules as well as the main 4.
Probably in this scenario, the UFE edition works great.
But lets point ourselves to the P88 and P93
Look at how much people loved how P88 was working, but the chem standard for that was P93.
It really depends. It was before my time here but I’ve read numerous posts about older versions of A314 that were less pure due to where the supplies were purchased from. It seems that these older versions packed a little more punch according to numerous members. The main issue according to Jas was a consistency problem. Getting the right batch that was “dirty” in just the right way was too difficult to replicate exactly from one batch to the next.
I’ve read Steve’s reports on A314 but bear in mind that without RU status those products are quite pricey due to the higher quality of molecules used…almost double the cost. And there’s no telling that the higher “octane” if you will, would have the same effect on product B that it had on product A. Feedback regarding older A314 indicates it was stronger than current, yet feedback on UFE indicates that it too is stronger than the current mainline version. Making Ammo or IG to the same standards would change it…but it’s unknown whether the change would be better or worse, it IS known that it would make the product a lot more expensive.
Personally I’d support the idea if I was currently disappointed with any of the consumer line products, but I’m not. They all work pretty much how they should and frankly making some products stronger could be problematic. Besides which if Ammo doesn’t seem to back as much punch as you’d like you can get it in 2X strength for a bit less than it would cost to get regular strength in a UFE version…which would basically double the cost if A314 is any indication.
Hey Rad,
I believe that UFE is more effective than stronger.
The quality of the molecules seem to have more of an efficient way that the pheromones are “received” by the receptors.
I personally equate stronger to alcohol proof. You can have alcohol at 80 proof right out of the fermenting process or you can have a more refined triple distilled made from better ingredients. One will give you a hangover and a terrible taste all night, and one will give you a less severe hangover with better taste and finish throughout the night.
But both can get you inebriated regardless.
Point in case, you’re not buying a bottle of georgi at a club, you’re doing goose.
As for A314, kettle one for rev 23
belvedere/goose rev 26
SBE One of those fruit vodkas
ENE Ciroc
This is just my personal analogies. I just know/like my vodka.
How creative is that 
Too bad I don’t speak Alcohol 
Petition for AMMO UFE edition?
Never gonna happen, no one wants to see another useless thread and more post whoring on the forum.
whatever, dude