Some good observations there, to me P93 is a male model molecule with feminine characteristics, and it has many other effects such as “in the zone” feeling, a little bit of a focus/performance enhancer, can cause a clingy fall-out effect and many other effects, so I think it’s wrong to assume it’s just a blonde/caucasian attractant as they usually respond well to pheromones in general.
P93 also has noted readhead/Northern European affinity.
Which can be useful in Scotland.
But yes, too much of it can have some gender bending effects and suddenly (and repeatedly) becoming the object of attraction for a rather imposing bulldyke who had previously been known to lamp men who had the temerity to touch her was a bit of an surprise! :o
I believe she was disappointed you didn’t respond to her open invitation. She said your dinner was better than hers because she was trying to get you to take the positive role and respond that it might be nice to have someone to share it with. Sharing food with a single woman is an ancient sign since the beginning of time, that a man feels her worthy of intimacy. Many times women accept the meal to test their self worth as in dating. The woman who invites herself to the mans meal is far different than say her cooking a dinner. She wanted to feel she was worthy of you providing, but you missed the queue. Instead she gave you a putdown when she left because she was offended. Her saying you need help related to your response, or lack of response in this case.
Never underestimate the key situation of providing a meal for a single woman in the place of your choosing. This is an ancient signal since the cave days that if you continue to show attention she wants to be intimate at some point. This is completely different than any other meal or dinner date situation. She initiated the desire for that age old care knowing she would respond intimately. Its hard coded in the DNA.
The bummer is you were tired, beat up and not all the way sharp so that one slipped by you.
My sweet spot of AMMO is about 2 sprays, but I like a little bit more Androstenone for a stronger effect. So 3 sprays for me is a lot less hits but when adding P74 to it, it’ll increase the range of girls attracted. Ratio wise, without weaking the Androstenone effects either 2:1 or 1,5:1 - Androstenone:P74
What does anyone think about CM II but replacing the IO with… what? I don’t have IO, and it’s way to expensive for me right now. Anything else I can put in there to achieve similar affect with young girls? I know its the anol, but I don’t have any of that unfortunately…
P114 was a tolerable alternative but that’s also off the menu FTM.
TAA/P130 seems to bring-on a lot of talk for me, so if you have any Summer Ammo, adding IH to that might be a way forward?
Or if you have some SOE, that could be useful as it is mainly alphanol but matching the doses to get similar diffusion from its oil base could be a challenge?
Well I do have IS, which contains TAA I believe. I was actually hoping to replace IO with something I already owned, so I’ll try the IS. I know nothing I have is similar to IO, but you know what I mean.
Yes, I really like the IH/IS (or TAA) combo for its conversational vibe - In fact I like it a lot more than IO in most situations - The IS helps steer the IH away from being too deep/serious and into happy/playful/shared experience territory and inspires more mature/quality conversation in a way that IO does not. IH/IS is also fully usable alongside A314 without weakening its vibe and can also be steered into very sexual/trusting/sharing territory with a variety of sexuals and a “tell me all” attitude!
IO of course is still superb for setting-up rapport quickly in situations where the opportunity for conversation is more limited - clubs, loud/busy places where opportunities for conversation are more limited and you are less likely to suffer the “torrent of drivel” effect it can promote.
Oh and never be caught by the pub bore when waring IO or CTTM II - you will never get rid of them politely!
