can someone explain the differences in the mixes for me? thank you.
One’s 50/50 and one’s 90/10. And then some minor adjustments. IIRC.
90/10? wow! i like the minor adjustments cushion.wonder if i’ll gab in my dreams while im sniffing this stuff off my shirt,lol.
Tout IH was strickly B-noled and CTTM 2 was A-nol dominant, say? :o
There’s a thread omewhere in which it is revealed that IH and IO are, IIRC, 90/10+ adjustments. IH is 90% b-nol, and IO is 90% a-nol.
But I could be in error. 
One is dominant in each, but it’s not a 90/10 spread.
On the other hand, CTTM M2 is almost perfectly half and half. It’s much a much simpler mix. It just has two pheromones, and that’s it.
CTTM Mix 2 effects are considerably different than Instant Honesty.
Instant Honesty has quite a bit of error correction to reduce the negatives of beta-nol. CTTM Mix 2 has none.
CTTM Mix 2, however, should be better for attraction than Instant Honesty.
I find for attraction, both simple or “raw” mixes, as well as vast, symphonic mixes, work best. That’s right – both the simply and the overly complex. The extremes.
Whereas the elegant middle ground tends to work best for daily life, relationships, work, etc.
Think about it. This works with personality types, too. Attraction wise, we tend to be most taken with those who are either ultra-primitive/brute, or those who immensely refined. The middle ground doesn’t get your juices flowing much, unless you’re looking for a good solid parent for your future children.
So that’s why people like androstenone…
Or any single pheromone
Heck, you can read “hit reports” at basenotes.net, a normal perfume site, for Andron. That came out out over 25 years ago (1981). Besides the fragrance, the only pheromone it contained was alpha-nol. That’s it!
http://www.basenotes.net/ID26120099.html
“I would give my left ___ to locate a case of this.”
Again… Alpha-nol, my friend. Just friendly ol’ alpha-nol. (if you search around the forums a bit, you can see what I describe as the “blank effect” from alpha-nol, which are brains can sometimes attribute to attraction)
Incidentally, our fragrances are designed for us by the same same fragrance technology development house that developed Andron for Jovan.
So we’re actually the closest thing to Andron these days. Just updated with 25 more years of experience.
So it’s a soloist or an orchestra that does for the best music, eh? goes off to add stuff to Seduction
Heh. I don’t know how much this would extend to music.
I definitely can’t say the “best” music.
The sexiest music, maybe.
You know, it’s interesting. If I think of recent examples of bands, I can’t think of many that had members spilling out of their sides that did well.
There was a band that got popular a few years back, that did omages of old 60s and 70s tunes… White Stripes… it had a skilled singer/guitarist, and a dummer that could barely drum. That was it. No bassist or anything. It got popular very quickly.
Rap is pretty big, and it’s minimalistic. Very beat driven. Clubs these days are overrun by rap, and clubs like to play what’s sexy (or at leasy raunchy!)
So …
CTTM 2 = A and B-nol 50:50;
IOpeness = A-nol;
and IHonesty = B-nol, say? :o
has anyone experienced IH becooming more attraction oriented when paired with say, ISexi or cops? i agree i havent noticed anything attractive about IH and i wear all the time, its one of my favs. perfect for work when people want to come in and get out and you know if they hang out a while they will buy more (not unnessesary stuff,its not flighty like pure anol, but if they are going to buy stuff somewhere anyway…) so it would be innappropriate for attraction-based mix (thats why IH is sooo perfect) but if i like the effects but want to add more for later in the day…
sorry to bring up the dead, but what exactly do you mean by error correction?? what are some of the negative effects of beta-nol??
BAH! For a second there, I thought Lor was back 
.
The only negative effects IH are knowing to much about things you don’t want to know. . . and you might say things you don’t want known.