Deciphering Our Natural Phero Signature

Pheromone Science Pheromone Theory & Molecules
1

Hi all, i only just joined the forum and posted the following quesion in my “hello” intro post.

Question : How do we figure out what our natural phero signature is, and how it changes or responds to enviroments and interactions.
Is there an official method, Is there any research into this. Have there been any studies, or is it all guess work.

Id love to find a way to no what my actual signature is, it would help us figure out what we needed to use.

In fact someone should come up with a kind of swab we can buy from the shop that tells us what pheroes were throwing out. Now come on u gotta admit That would be cool.:wink: :smiley:

Anyone got feed back on this one.

2

I’m damn glad you posted this, or like I said in the reply to your intro, I would have stolen it and claimed the idea as my own.

I too would like to hear ideas on this. I think the phero swab would be nifty.

3

Ya, that would be awsome. I’d love to figure out some way to read my phero signiture.

4

I don’t think that this is likely to happen. Breeders are still trying to decipher the differences in the pheromone signatures of other species, as indicated by this reference: Expression of 3{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, cytochrome P450-c17, and sulfotransferase 2B1 proteins in liver and testis of pigs of two breeds: Relationship with adipose tissue androstenone concentration – Moe et al. 85 (11): 2924 – Journal o

If you look at the abstract, I think that you will see why deciphering any human’s natural pheromone signature is a problem. Basically, if it’s difficult to do with androstenone in pigs, it’s not going to happen for humans, at least not anytime soon. On the other hand, this study suggests that fat loss in humans might make someone smell less like a pig, which means that cross-species comparisons may give some of us an advantage.

James V. Kohl
http://www.pheromones.com

5

Tut,
:angry:

Spoilsport :stuck_out_tongue:

6

Dang, it would be so cool. Looks like we’ll have to wait.