IH is more effective than IO? is it true?

No, it is not. It is a a separate biochemical mechanism - libido, moderated by the same testosterone metabolite that causes pattern baldness - DHT. Physiological ED is a failure of the vascular system and the nitrous oxide. For guys and gals, there are two steps involved - desire and engorgement. For women, it is analogous to horniness and wetness but women can respond with wetness (as on performing “the wifely duty” out of duty) while men need both.

And viagra, cialis, and/or levitra is taken as an insurance policy before every date and never fails, unless a good dose of IH is involved. Even then, it is erections happen spontaneously, as in regular morning wood.

Hence, I suspect that IH works against dihydrotestosterone-driven libido, not against the plumbing.

As to your argument that A-1 doesn’t positively affect your PMS because you don’t HAVE PMS - I suggest you have a cup of coffee, and rethink that. It is illogical on its face.

I don’t drink coffee, I tried to take it up but I just dont like it. I did have a cup of tea and think about it. I even asked my husband about it. Nope neither of us have seen the symptoms of PMS in me. Could be because I was on the pill most of my adult life though. The pill is known for calming those symptoms. I am not on it now and still get my period but my moods don’t change nor do I suffer from the physical signs other then the actual menstruation.

I don’t get cramps or bloating, I don’t experience mood changes. I know there are hundreds of other symptoms that can indicate PMS but I just don’t experience them. Only something like 80% of women have those symptoms. This is not to say I never get moody or I never get other symptoms that could be mistaken for PMS. Other factors cause them. People like to blame all there symptoms on hormones. Sometimes a bitch is just a bitch and it has little to do with there hormones. LOL Its my opinion lots of people use PMS as a excuse for behavior.

So A1 cant effect a symptom I dont have. I have always reported that A1 or IFM has done little for me. I dont find it eases me but then again I am in a state of ease most of the time. Just recently I have gone through some stressful events that have nothing to do with my hormones or PMS. Maybe it would have helped cause feelings of ease then but I wasnt exposed so I cant say for sure.

I agree with this partly but sexual drive (libido) in itself is not just a biological function. How that drive manifests in all humans male and female is determined by psychological and cultural factors as well. Its widely known that desire for sex can be affected by many outside sources like stress, anxiety, pressure. IMO, its likely when you put all those variables together for you Physically, mentally and biologically, IH can be the catalyst that creates this reaction for you but to say that IH causes lack of libido in men because you experience its is not a true depiction of IH and its function.

Now if everyone was reporting this that in my opinion would point to it being the cause because we all experience different psychological and emotional factors.

Either way if you don’t like IH and you find it causes this then by all means don’t use it. Pheromones are not one size fits all and I am not doubting your experience of lack of libido. What I am saying is there could be other physical mental and biological issue that for you could have caused a cascade of issues that resulted in your experience.

Oh and I am not argueing, I am discussing.

Tisha

I’m using the word “argument” in its logic sense of a proposition to be considered, proven, or disproved. I can be annoyingly logical.

Libido in men differs from libido in women. There are the common biochemical drivers for sex but it is tempered by inhibition. The concentrations of the drivers (estrogen, dihysdrotestosterone) vary with gender and with age. For the adult male, inhibition is not too powerful and consequently, many guys will bonk any woman of legal age and reasonable aroma. I pride myself on not being THAT bad!

For women, inhibition is VERY important or else we’d all born bastards from a first-come, first-served environment. “Who’s your daddy?” would be an unanswerable question. Also, women are far more ruled by their emotional equipment than are men, where emotion is relatively undeveloped - a warrior can’t go all emo in a crisis, now can he?

For me, IH has some side effects that are very unpleasant. I’m merely trying to give the best, most accurate, and most honest reports I can. I’m experienced in pheromones and in my sexual state and responses and have offered the best analysis of my experiences I can.

I note that other men share my depressive reaction to A-1 - maybe 20% of men report it while 80% note no noticeable affect. I would be interested if other men note the same libido dampening effects of IH. If so, please report.

Still, IH can have its uses just not when I’m intent on bonking a lady friend!

I would love to hear more about this if you didn’t mind elaborating a little bit :slight_smile:

Why wouldn’t we use both IO and IH to get the best of both world?

You can but it will be far too much nols for many mixes - knocks other components right out of proportion. Loading-up all the pheros together is often not good, makes for an overcomplex and ultimately confusing signal. Two or three products can often be deployed far more effectively.

IO/IH together in equal proportion is also the official replacement for the product CTTM2 - Which does just what the name suggests, promotes a lot of conversation. At least as good as IO on its own, if not better but maybe not so deep/engaging as IH. Stil a useful mix but personally it has always produced its best results around guys for me.