It is really subjective because if you are good at starting conversation then you want IH. But if you aren’t good at starting conversation but once things get going you find yourself asking the right questions then you want IO.
Of course thats just opinion but its also how the formulas were designed and explained to me on the backend here.
I find IH works better for me. I usually use it with A314 or something else that gives me enough confidence to start conversation. And like John said, if you can start the conversation, IH will be better.
I like them both but I favor IH over IO only because of its depth. They are both social just on different levels. IO which is heavier in anol causes attraction as well while IH causes connection.
I would suggest starting with IO especially if you want them to approach you more.
wow thx for all the replies, so It’s still about the useness? I am good at starting conversation but besides I want a girl I want to get along with new friends to, so IO is good to make more friends, and IH is to choose the right one
I love IO for parties, social events, where a little silliness is okay, or where I need to immediately dispel awkward tension. IH is what I break out when I’ve got work to do on a single person, or small group that I want to bond. It’s more serious, more deep. Most report that IH is better with a314 though, and that IO can have odd effects in combination with A314.
Yep, the couple of times I’ve used IH, even with Viagra, the darn thing wouldn’t work quite right. I also get depressed with A-1, more so that average.
The other stuff, especially A-none, does the opposite.
I look at it this way… IO is great for opening especially if you’re in a situation where you don’t know a lot of people. It eases approachability and inspires light type chatter on both sides. Lighter chatter in content/subject matter, usually, surface stuff and a lot of it. Good for breaking the ice and great paired with IShine in a crowd.
IH isn’t as “quantity” because it gives people the impression they’ve known you for a long time. So it often inspires a feeling of comfort in your targets and that enables them to connect with you on a deeper more personal/intimate level that, more often than not, results in “quality” conversations.
So, it’s not that one is better than the other. They both have their applications. Which one you choose depends on your objective. Consider the circumstance… what’s the occasion?.. where will you be?.. who will you be with? You get what I mean. It’s up to you to determine which will best serve you and suit your purpose.
I still have a lot more experimenting to do but I’ve had three separate occasions using IH where I could not believe what was coming out of their mouths! It is some powerful stuff. I like using it when you first start dating someone and you’re looking to form a close knit bond with the other person. Bottomline: it works.
IH does not cause erectile dysfunction unless you suffer from erectile dysfunction already. It can enhance whats already there and bring the truth out one way or another.
Its the same with A1. It doesn’t cause depression but if you suffer from depression it can bring those feelings to the surface.
Pheromone enhance what is already present. They can not trigger something in you that does not yet exist.
Its how IH brings truth to the surface and people end up blurting things you never thought or they never thought they would say out loud. Its comfort connection and trust brings it to the surface almost like being compelled to tell you or show you what is hidden within. This surfacing can manifest both on a physical level and a verbal level.
In most cases I see IH bring forth positive feelings of connection and intimacy. The thing about IH though is you have to be prepared to hear the underlying truth because its coming whether its negative or positive.
People sometimes misunderstand mones thinking they will make people feel something they don’t thus they react to that feeling. Mones cant make a person who hates you and has absolutely no attraction for you suddenly be attracted. They can only triggers whats already within, whats sometimes hidden by the mask we wear to hide those emotions for whatever reason. Its like taking the mask off, what you finally get is what is hidden beneath good or bad.
This scares some people but in my experience whats hidden beneath is usually positive. Its human nature, we are all born into one state and thats one of happiness and well being. Life experiences are what makes you choose your mask.
I am reluctant to disagree with Tisha and will admit that corollation is not ALWAYS causation, BUT she’s wrong in these cases. I think part of this argument is regulatory fear in that admitting pheromones TOO strong a direct affect is to open the door to political treatment of them as drugs.
I feel stronger about this with A-1 and offer a counter-argument that we seem to agree that A-1 causes relief from PMS irritation and depression. If we agree to that affect in females then we can certainly agree that it can do something like the opposite for men.
As to the IH deterring male tumescence, who’s dick is it anyway? Perhaps if my partner(s) had been more beautiful or less emotional or had better technique (alternate hypotheses), IH would have had no effect. However, that was not my experience - the male will to penetrate was diminished and the urge to pelvic thrusting vanished or was reduced.
Again, even at my age I’m darn reliable in the sack [Applause!] with the help of modern medical miracles and remain quite the horndog. I notice it when something is amiss and try to find the cause and fix it. I owe that to the women of the world!
A1 doesn’t relieve PMS or depression in me although I don’t suffer from either. Although your comparing relieve from to cause of. A1 doesn’t cause PMS or depression in females. It doesn’t cause it in males. It just doesn’t relieve it in males like it does for some females. It enhances it.
You are welcome to disagree with me when ever you want. I am not going to put a curse on you. I know you probably heard rumors but I am not the medusa they make me out to be
I am not afraid they will treat them as drugs. I don’t sell mones and have access to labs so even if they come down on the industry I can get them. Its my opinion people tend to give mones far more power then they have.
I cant say I agree that IH caused the erectile dysfunction. Viagra has a 30% failure rate which means its not going to work every time. I am agreeing it could have set off the symptoms of a pre existing problem of ED. Its easy enough to test though. Does all the equipment work every time when your not using IH and have not used Viagra ? If not it was a pre-existing problem.
Sort of like when you have a heart attack. Suppose your at the gym running on the treadmill and you have a heart attack. The exercise didn’t kill you. Pre-existing heart disease did. The exercise like the IH was just the catalyst not the cause.
I know you probably heard rumors but I am not the medusa they make me out to be