What do y’all think?
Let me first start with saying that I view mones as being the “food and flavor” for the nose, which no one can resist or detect (everyone has to breath); unlike food and flavor for the mouth that the person actually can choose to eat and enjoy.
Food stimulates enjoyment or disgust, and likewise mones stimulate the mind and mood to “feel” enjoyment or disgust.
Now…
It is common on almost every thread to read someone elses report on their findings or experience with one product or combination of products. And, of course, the fine details can be found in journals.
I do enjoy reading these, to an extent.
As I read the threads packed with reports and journals full of details, I began to wonder a couple of things.
First, are mones causing users to be more attentive to their surroundings? Does the mind of the user become stimulated more than normal, and so much so, that the mind records information in a much more articulate manner?
Second, are some of the experiences and findings (reports and journals) just normal events that take place? And, are some viewing the events through the eyes of mone usage, therefore presumably attributing the series of events to the influence of the mones?
Look at it this way…before mones were in your life, normal stuff happened, and maybe you never thought twice about it. People talked to you, girls looked at you, people seemed moody, etc. And perhaps, your only thoughts at the time were “What was that all about? I don’t even know that girl. Why is she smiling so much?” or “Wow, what’s he all upset about? Rough night drinking, I guess,” or whatever your mind came up with at the time.
And now with mones in your life, you see through the mones eyes; and attribute some, if not all, behavior to being caused by the mones.
And with that said, there should to be a distinction between what is just normal behavior and what is behavior caused by mones. I don’t know each of you, or if that is or is not already the goal of your reports and journals.
I don’t doubt these foods and flavors for the nose, and certainly they do play a part in socializing. But, I am also lead to believe that most people can hold their own and maintain a consistent degree of character. And a brief run-in with a mones cloud may or may not cause a drastic change in behavior.
Example: You walk passed a co-worker in the hallway and he stops to ask you a question, with a blank stare on his face. The conversation lasted 30 seconds and you both continued walking opposite directions. Maybe you ask yourself , “Was he bothered by my heavy NONE usage? Was it the TUTH or the MX301? Was it too intimidating? I gotta try some shine tomorrow instead.”
Or… perhaps the chap had only a few hours sleep the night before and just wasn’t in the mood for long conversations, and it all had nothing to do with the mones.
Lastly, without a numerical value given to an event or experience, it is impossible to determine how much influence was being caused by the mones. We can only hope to be using the mones, in the right amount, and at the right time.
We can only use our best judgment to decide what is just normal behavior, and what is behavior being influenced by the mones. Hopefully, that is what everyone has been doing.