the point is that the group will act that way. (you need to watch groups to initially grasp this dimension of TAC - a dyad won’t do). it’s possible but rare that one person could shift group energy in that direction and it probably only works in certain contexts. also i think goofiness is a different thing from what arises from tac-acceptance.
dyadic (one to one) bonding is different from the group acceptance. you might have a cooler vibe with a little TAC, but I don’t think it will be anything like as intense as betanol or as steady as rone.
tac-itus is the genius with an exquisitely developed and unusual collection of skills. all his posts here and on another forum are worth reading several times. (one chunk at a time). people should experiment a bit more with TAC and TAA - they pull in different directions, but why is this? what does it tell us about their natures?
i did wonder whether tac might be an element of instant gentleman (the smoothness), although I have never observed the hilarity with it. i don’t think i have used tac much in proper complex mixes - always in 25+mcg hits.
note that the hilarity doesn’t seem to happen every time. i would say 1 out of 3-4 times when in a group. it’s doing more to group energies than just making people feel comfortable. but operating at level just below what i can notice and then describe in a crisp way.
projection of power (whether none caveman or rone daddy) combined with tac ease = attractive combination: spezzatura.