Wow! Yesterday I tried out MX108, which is part three in the Drive Him Carzy series. I seriously love this stuff. I only applied one single spray of this to my neck area, and within fifteen minutes I myself felt very aroused, like a cat in heat. Purrrrrr… So, needless to say, I was on the prowl. It didn’t take very long before I got a favorable ‘reaction’ from my fiance. He buried his face in my neck and said that I smelled awesome, then we started making out. Talk about results! We almost didn’t make it to the bedroom!
So far I have also tried MX106 and MX111. I definitely don’t care too much for MX111, I feel crabby when I wear it. And the jury is still out for MX106, although several nights ago I applied four sprays of it before going to bed, and my fiance woke me up in the middle of the night feeling a bit frisky.
All in all, MX108 has impressed me the most thus far.
Have you tried this one out yet Countess? I would be interested to hear about your results on this mix too.
Oh, and Jasmin, if you guys decide to make this mix into a full-fledged product, you should call it Instant Desire. I think that has a nice ring to it.
MX108 I still havent tried this one. In fact I kindof put the Drive Him Crazy Line on the back burner. I’ll have to rummage through my arsenol and give MX108 another try.
I am still having great results with this mix. Whenever I want to “make things more interesting” with my fiance, I apply somewhere between 3-5 sprays, usually to my neck(front and back), hair, wrists, and cleavage. This never fails for me. I am surprised at how rapidly this works it’s magic on my fiance. He is practically ripping my clothes off at inopportune moments, within a very short period of time after being exposed to me wearing this mix. His reaction is very strong.
Last night I applied 5 sprays of this before heading out to Best Buy to have them check out a problem with one of our computers. I had the whole ‘geek squad’ swarmed around me, all men, all vying for my attention and ooooing and ahhing over the theming on the computer. Amusing and strange. As I was browsing around the store looking at earbuds for my Ipod, a male sales associate, who was obviously gay, approached me. He was very friendly with me, so much so that it was bordering on flirtation. He was definitely ‘in my personal space.’ I was amused that this mix would have an affect like this on a gay male. Interesting…
And no, the mix did not fail me later on that evening when we were home alone. I think this is definitely becoming one of my favorite Androtics products. I may just load up on several bottles of it.
what do you think is in it, judging by your knowledge of the various mixes you use? copulins? TaH? i believe 108 had 4 pheromones,no? im interested on your take on this,Ilsa my dear… oh and one more thing-
if your using 5 sprays, should it be stronger? or is it just fun to put in many places? it sounds passive to me,as opposed to TaL-ish…
When these mixes first came out, Michael told me that there are definitely cops in them. I think it is a definite possibility that there is TAH in this one. And I would also say Beta-nol and Alpha-nol. - Could be wrong, but I think it is a definite possibility.
Actually I was just trying to ‘push the limit’ a bit by applying five sprays. I think three is more than adequete.
that was helpful,ilsa.
i use IH and either-instant-sexiness as well as taH. sounds like it would be nice to have a mix that has what i like all together like this one.
I think I’m going to re-release them (under new MX###s) without the copulins. You can add them yourself if you want, but the real thing I want to test is the pheromones.
TAH is a favorite molecule of many women. Now that we’re actively gaining more female members, it’s time to push forward full throttle to develop powerful TAH-centric formulae. (and more products for women, in general)
Umm..Michael, why would you do that? Maybe you should have a wee read through our most recent forum posts.
Just about every one of us gals is using cops - a lot!
..or does this mean you’re almost ready to come out with your As-effective-as-EW-while-not-compromising-your-beliefs, version of a copulin additive? Is that what you mean by us adding cops if we want?
Now, that WOULD be something..
We love the social pheromones of course, but those of us who use EW very regularly are DYING for you to bring out your version, or as near as dammit, without getting into territory you don’t want to enter..
It ain’t just the guys who like to play, and use pheromones for sexual purposes - far from it. ^_~
Ail, I understand what you’re saying, and I fully and completely understand the importance of copulins to the ladies here.
While Copulins aren’t the only sexual element for women (pheromones count, too!), you know first hand that even bad mixes of copulins have shown themselves to be extremely sexual in some contexts. Natural copulins also have a history of being used through the ages to create sexual results with a high degree of certainty. (and I preferably prefer the latter blend of copulins! )
So copulins are important. I’m not saying, and have never said they’re not. They’re certainly something interesting to develop, which why we’re investing significatly to have a new breed of copulins developed by a chemosensory artist skilled at replicating natural scents.
However, that’s not yet done. As you know, product development takes years. The development of completely new copulin formulary isn’t something that happens overnight.
Copulin formulation today (whether EW, what Pherone sells, or what we have) is all based on a formula found in a study that was made more than 20 years ago. It’s inelegant compared to the art of pheromone science we’ve achieve. It’s ugly, dark ages type stuff compared to what we do with human pheromones.
For this reason, I don’t wish to include today’s substandard breed copulin formulary in any of my test mixes that test novel pheromones and/or new pheromone ratios. Unless it’s a well worn mix, what I want to test just the pheromones. The part that we have the most control over. The part we understand the part. The part we can with elegance and grace.
We can do a test with copulins added to a well tested pheromone mix at the very the end. This will achieve better results, faster.
Keep in mind that our pheromones (especially the newer ones and experimentals) cost a fortune to create, whereas current copulin formulary currently doesn’t. You can make a gallon of current style copulins for what it costs to make a single full size experimental mixes that use some of the more cutting edge molecules. If a superior pheromone blend and substandard copulins clash when blended together in one bottle, that’s a lot of money down the drain.
Worse, keep in mind that testing too many unknowns costs us excessive time. Time that could’ve been spent getting usable data. Wasting time upsets me far more than wasting money. As wise men have been known to say – “I can always make more money, but I can’t make more time!”
For these reasons, I’m just going to go what we know works first, with as few variables (wildcards) as possible.
You should understand that at least 3 of the DHC mixes shouldn’t have failed. There were a few others that were more experimental, but 3 were based on successful mixes women were using anyway, without copulins. The only wildcard that introduced different results were the copulins to already successful TAH based mixes. I added them because of forum member requests. Yet most of the mixes designed to match those cries for mixes that include copulins were met will ill favor. Too many variables! Impossible to debug.
So, to summarize, we’ll test what we’re best at – pheromone only mixes. Then, if a mix succeeds, we’ll add copulins sometime down the line… preferably our new revolutionary formula that will take copulins into the 21st century.
Please understand… This is a testing strategy, not a rail against copulins. As they say, the best way to do things sometimes is “one step at a time”.
Just be sure to give post feedback to the weekly test mixes. That’s a key to driving this forward. So far, the guys seem to speak out more about test mixes than the woman (the opposite of what I’d expect).
Michael, I’m very glad to hear you’re working on the glorious new cops formula, and I’m sure when you release it, it will have been worth the wait (just hoping I still remember what I wanted to use it for …)
Honestly, if I wasn’t outsourcing the task, it would probably be coming along much more quickly.
I just can’t stand the smell of many of the components involved in high concentration in isolation. I also go anosmic to high concentrations of individuals notes too quickly. Most truly good perfumers have a nose that’s been developing at least 20 years. There’s a lot of nuances to deal with to get things right in the olfactory realm, and I just haven’t been at this long enough to feel comfortable enough to do it myself.
You also have to have enough experience to know how what YOU smell translates to a nose that isn’t as experienced. It’s truly an art that requires years upon years of dedication to calibrate your senses correctly.
He buried his face in my neck and said that I smelled awesome, then we started making out. Talk about results! We almost didn’t make it to the bedroom!
oh and one more thing-