Natural pheromone question

Is there a way that anyone knows of how to measure your natural pheromone emission? I’m curious to know if how much you naturally
emit determines how much extra you need to add to pheromone effectiveness.

I tried to search for some research, but I found nothing about natural pheromone emission yet, so if someone find it, plz post them :slight_smile: It will be extremely help!

It would be cool, but right at the moment I believe it is sci-fi.

I don’t think there is a technology to measure the amount of natutal pheromones that we produce. It will be extremely useful if we have equipment to meaasure.

Actually there is but it would cost you a arm and a leg in extensive lab testing and it would also be time consuming and useless in some ways.

Here is why, suppose you go to the gym and work out, pheromone production will change. Suppose you go out drinking and feel sick for a day or two pheromone production will change. Suppose you just watched a dirty movie, pheromone production will change. Its not stable on a day to day basis so even if you spent the money to find out the next day could be slightly different.

This is why we talk about your “sweet spot” being a range and not a set amount of sprays.

Example… I know that my range for Instant Shine is 3 to 6 sprays. Dependng on many factors like when my monthly is, when I ovulate, If I have been eating right, If I went to the gym ect ect … These factors tell me how much will likely work for me on a given day.
If I go to the gym my endorphines are up and I need less, I will be emitting my own pheromones strongly. Sunday I am going to a party so I need more because I will be drinking.

Can I prove this with documentation… Nope

But I have seen patterns with my own pheromone use and with my friends use of pheromones. I have talked to my brother extensively on the subject. He is a scientist for exxon specializing in chemical engineering but he has a
Pharmaceutical degree as well and when I asked him the same question its what he told me. Course I had to have him repeat it in my language ( I dont speak scientist :stuck_out_tongue: ) but I got the gist of it LOL

He got all the brains in the family and I got all the looks. He gets pissed when I say that LOL

Tisha

This is sort of deep… but working with pheros has taught me how transitory stuff we call our “personalities” really are, they are highly maleable based on circumstance, I believe. Many schools of Buddhism and Hinduism hold that the “self” is illusion. People change moment by moment and the only thing holding us together is our awareness of the change- this is a common theme in Eastern philosophy, the illusion of the self. It’s not something you have to aggree with (I’m not sure I do, perhaps there is another, simpler explanation I’m not aware of, viz a viz Occam’s Razor and science), but my experience with pheros leads credence to that idea. You can get the same experience with drugs or medications, though. Lots of psychiatric drugs will result in personality changes, even in healthy people. When does “you” stop being “you”? What is “normal”? Who knows. I happen to believe our personalities are mostly based on collections of our experiences, plus genetics. Personalities do change over time, sometimes fast, sometimes very slowly.

Lots of people live most of their adult lives, more or less, with what psychiatrists call dysthymia. (Charles Dickens would be a good example). Low grade depression (and generally they have low suicide rates as compared to other psychiatric patients). If they take psychiatric drugs, their personality might change, and they might not recognize themselves. Again, what is normal?

I’d say, if we did measure pheros for normal people, probably a good estimate would be whatever you got as a baseline after a shower and a couple days without showering, plus some physical activity (no, lots of physical activity), and a good mood without any crap happening, that would probably be as close as you get to “normal” for most people. This would probably be “congruent” at least with our evolutionary biology/selfish-genes. But is this the “right” mix? That’s another matter.

Thanks everyone for the feedback!