Now out: MX305-310 Raw Power Test Pack, with a catch

[renny]

Hey Gone, I think the biggest difference is in the “diffusion curve”. With alcohol as in TUTH, it seems you diffuse the maximum amount soon after application. With the oil based Raw it seems to take awhile before it starts having effects and the effect “ramps up” gradually. That’s my take anyway. I’m sure alcohol based could have the same curve, depends on the fixatives.

@Gone_with_the_Wind

I didn’t see the new batch in the store yet. Perhaps I’m looking in the wrong place.

It’s an interesting question as to whether to add an oil carrier. anone, of all the pheromones, seems to already last a long time and have relatively low diffusion. The low difusion can be masked by its ability to build up over time. Buildup can give the illusion of high diffusion.

For me, alcohol is just fine as a carrier for anone. The molecule itself seems to already have the advantages we get from putting other pheromones in an oil carrier. I may not be the best test case though, because I am fairly anone tolerant. The only real “ghosting” effect I ever got was from wearing 5 sprays of pheroproof. I think that was a cologne OD rather than an effect from the anone, because I have worn equivalent amounts of anone and more without experiencing the ghosting.

It will be interesting to hear some of the younger or less anone tolerant guys weigh in on the pros and cons of alcohol and oil carriers for anone.