Right I’m at work on an oilrig, and convocation can get limited to pure cod shit sometimes. Today’s main convocation has been about drunken monkeys. The largest debate on this topic was…
Who would win? A usually peaceful that has found his monkey wife in bed with his monkey brother and got unusually aggressive on cider and is armed with a knife.
OR!
A normally violent monkey that had been drinking Stella armed only with his street smart savvy and his criminal record. (For out American brother and sisters that’s really strong larger, well not so much strong just violent larger, or as you call it beer)
Anyway I was wondering if someone were to spray this stuff we buy on monkeys would they have the same effect?
For a mental scenario we can say… find the monkeys above, ready to go at it in an ally, and spray them both with two shots of instant shine, one to the neck and one to the chest. Followed by a couple of shots of instant honesty to get the upset monkeys feeling out there. And maybe a shot of P79 to maybe heighten the effects of both and get this monkey brawl calmed down.
Who thinks we would have a chance to stop this blood bath???
Well I do no -none was originated, from what I understand, from swine (Pig). So therefore it is logical that monkeys would produce their own types of pheromones.
I am just not certain whether monkeys would actually be affected by synthetic human pheromones. Perhaps one of the research labs uses monkeys as research subjects rather than humans.
There are many pheromones that we use which are not specific to humans, only someone who has an ulterior motive of selling their product will say something like that. For eaxmple Androstenol and Androstenone are secreted by pigs and monkeys too. There has been some research on monkeys with copulins and other pheromones (details available from a simple web search).
I also think it’s high time that we stop distinguishing synthetic and natural pheromones. For example synthetic androstenone is not in any way different from natural androstenone. Androstenone is a molecule and it remains exactly the same molecule no matter it is produced by human body or in a lab.
It’s the analogs that are different; like sandalwood oil consists of androstenone analogs (which means that it is not exactly androstenone, but another molecule, which has a similar molecular structure as androstenone). Since there are receptors in human nose (body) which work like a lock-and-key sometimes the analog molecules by virtue of their similar structure can fit in those receptors and show the same activity as the real molecule.
(Another thing worth distinguishing is that naturally produced pheromones created by our body are always produced in combination with other pheromones while synthetic pheromones are created in a lab in isolation)
Anyway this is my understanding…please feel free to point out any errors!
'Cause I don’t want any!!!