Sexual Tsunami

**
**Absent pheromones turn flies into lusty Lotharios :open_mouth: (Absent pheromones turn flies into lusty Lotharios | (e) Science News) Published: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 - 14:56 in Biology & Nature
**Related images
**

http://esciencenews.com/files/imagecache/image_medium/files/images/200910142137130.jpgProfessor Joel Levine

When Professor Joel Levine’s team genetically tweaked fruit flies so that they didn’t produce certain pheromones, they triggered a sexual tsunami in their University of Toronto Mississauga laboratory. In fact, they produced bugs so irresistible that normal male fruit flies attempted to mate with pheromone-free males and even females from a different species—generally a no-no in the fruit fly dating scene. The study, published in the Oct. 15 issue of Nature, points to a link between sex, species recognition and a specific chemical mechanism, and is part of Levine’s larger research into the genetic basis of social behaviour.

“This is important not only from the point of view of understanding social dynamics, but it’s also fundamental biology, because these pheromones provide recognition cues that facilitate reproductive behaviour,” says Levine, an assistant professor of biology. “Lacking these chemical signals (pheromones) eliminated barriers to mating. It turned out that males of other species were attracted to females who didn’t have these signals, so that seemed to eliminate the species barrier.”

In this study, they focused on recognition—how individual Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies) know what their species is and what their sex is. While previous studies had suggested that pheromones played an important role, Levine’s team decided to genetically eliminate a certain class of these chemicals, called cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones, to determine their particular effect.

The researchers found that female flies bred without the hydrocarbons were melanogaster Marilyn Monroes to normal males. But the effect didn’t stop there—males lacking the hydrocarbons were also sexually irresistible. In fact, females lacking the hydrocarbons were so sexy that males of other Drosophila species courted them.

When the researchers treated females bred without the hydrocarbons with a female aphrodisiac, it restored the barrier preventing sex between species, suggesting that a single compound can provide species identity. “That means the same chemical signals and genes are underlying not only social behaviour in groups, like courtship and mating, but also behaviour between species.”

Levine stresses that while pheromones are part of the human mating dance, the cues for attraction are far more complex in our species.
“Although I am no expert on human pheromones, there is evidence that men and women may discriminate odours from the same sex or other sexes differently, and there’s even some evidence that how an individual discriminates those odours may reflect their gender preference,” he says. "We may rely more on the visual system, and we may have a more complex way of assessing other individuals and classifying them and determining how we’re going to relate to them than a fly does.

“But what we’re looking at is a spectrum across biology of a tendency to understand how others relate to ourselves. It’s clearly an issue that humans are caught up in—it’s in our art, like Madame Butterfly and it’s in our newspapers, in terms of sports issues like the recent controversy about the sexual identify of the South African runner Caster Semenya.”

Interesting…so having no signature at all causes you to be most desirable, but according to this forum, having a signature too confusing can lead to ghosting (no desire whatsoever.)

Well it happens with fruit flies … lol. Not sure what would happen if a person had no phero signature. Well - sorta - you do wash a lot of your phero signature off with a good shower in the morning so you may come sorta close for a while.

And yes - too high a phero signature or too confusing a signature can lead to people ignoring you.

In effect this theory would be the same thing. It would appear that the fruit flies are using pheromones to put other species and potential mates off rather than using them to attract (which is our current line of thinking here).

Following that same theory and applying it to humans if you were to add a cocktail of pheromones you are singling yourself out as a very unique individual who is not compatible with the majority and in turn only those who seek your signature will be attracted although potentially very much so and you may even put others off you who would have been open to the approach before.

I believe that it’s a balance… True fact… USUALLY, a person is going to marry someone like their parents or the exact opposite.

A woman who is high in testosterone is either going to be a bitch, or super-highly sexually charged.

What if a person were to wear a shitload of -NONE and be completely nice and cool…

What if a complete geek were to wear a shitload of -NONE, he might offend the females in his circle of friends, but attract the girl who strips part-time at the local Gentlemans Club.

See what I mean?

My ideal combination is something that makes me innocent… completely innocent.

A highly-sexual being with a girl believing most of what he says leads to some pretty heavy results.

I (or he) might be able to be more direct in their approach.

I see, so perhaps how you act can contribute to how the opposite sex sees you along with your pheromone signature?