OK, so I am having some misgivings about the stealth diffusion technology. I believe I am getting inconsistent results, because it requires the target to be a lot closer than without stealth diffusion. With respect to Project UF2.5, I thought MX460 was better than MX461 which was better than MX462. However, I lost my to-go of MX462 after testing it only one time at the club (darn, I hate losing these to-go’s; it is like throwing good money away
). My results were different from others who think MX462 is better. I just think the 'stealth diffusion may have something to do with the inconsistency in results. One day you get good results, the next day it is a whole different ball game.
It is hard enough to get consistent results with regular mones. You have to know your sweet spot, you have to know the number of sprays to use in a mix, you have to own the mones, it is affected by the clothes you wear if sprayed underneath clothes, it is affected by weather conditions etc. etc. It is a crapshoot with stealth diffusion. I have gone back to using products without the stealth diffusion at the club such as Ammo, IO, TUTH, IG, MX297 (instead of MX355-MX358), Instant Shine (instead of MX322 - MX329) and use the stealth diffusion mones only when I am up and about or sometimes on a date where I know I am going to be close to the lady. This is my personal opinion, can you tell that I am not a fan of stealth diffusion
? I could be wrong though.
Consumer Line: AMMO, A314, Instant Shine, Instant Openness, Instant Honesty, Turn Up the heat, Instant Gentleman, Instant Jerk, Come Talk To Me Mix 2, A1
MX Series: MX297, MX301, MX330, MX412, Project UF, Project UF2, Project UF2.5
Putatives: P75, P78, P83, P86, P91, P93, P96, P114, P130
Experimones: P74, P79, TAC, TAA