Sweet spot testing: does the environment shift it, like 3x Ammo vs 2x in heat?

I understand sweet spot testing is supposed to be fairly simple, and it is, however, I always seem to complicate things.

From my two week journey with - mones I have found that there seems to be more at play here:
*Application points
*Environment
*Congruency

I find that in situations with identical crowds that the environment can totally throw off the “sweet spot”. For example, my MD(Maximum Dosage) for Ammo is 3 sprays. Anything over that I become ghosted. For environments that are larger, and cooler, 3xAmmo is my sweet spot. However, for more humid/hotter smaller areas anything over 2XAmmo seems to ghost me…

What i’m trying to get at is that I personally believe that different evironments and application points have different sweet spots. Because if one day I decided to spray 3xAmmo
->Right side underwrist
->Left side underwrist
->One adam’s apple

The diffusion is completly different then say if I sprayed
->2xAmmo on adam’s apple
->1xAmmo on underside wrist and spread to other wrist

And then changing my exposure and who is getting affected by my - mones …

So in my theory it would be:

1)Type of affect wanted ie. (Sexual, physical dominance, friendliness, etc…)
2)Type of Interaction (1on1/small group/crowd)
3)Type of Environment(Big/Small/Humid/Dry,etc…)
4)Application points

And then so on, for larger environments, for warm closed etc…

*So you initially decide the affect you want others to feel around you. That’s the base of your decision, what kind of presence and/or vibe do I want my selected group/person to feel.
*Then you adjust for the general audience, am I having a 1 on 1, small businesss meeting, or large crowd?
*Then move on to environment factors…How will the area I will be in diffuse my - mones , and what exposure and strength do I want to give off?
*Taking into consideration the last 2 points, I place my - mones in areas that create the diffusion,and exposure I want.

Affect wanted= Choice of - mones
Type of Interaction= Choice of - mones +Dosage
Environment=Dosage
Application Points=Dosage+tactical planning

All of the above combined=SUCCESS

of course there’s a lot of variables. Even the most experienced users here get surprised sometimes with how certain products work in certain environments and dosages.

I still consider myself a newbie, but I’ve already learned that while for example in some situations (like a meeting with superiors) 3 drops of A314 is much too much, in other circumstances, like a celebrity party, 8 drops and more is perfectly fine.

Great post. Yes the variables are a huge part of the picture and many people dont get that. They think mones create the exact same response each and every time. Its just like any other language, context is part of the communication.

Your going to do very well with these products because you get it.

I love this post because it conveys what the experienced users have been trying to tell people very clearly. Nominating it. :smiley:

Tisha

Exactly. Sometimes when I see guys asking others about what exact dosages and ratios they have used in particular situations, because they like what they read and they want the same results… It’s like asking someone, “hey, what is the size of your shirt? I’m gonna buy the same one, no matter that you’re 6" taller and 30lb heavier than me, and I’m gonna wear it everywhere, to the gym, to the club and to my grandma’s funeral!”
We’re all different, every situation is different and that’s why this whole adventure is so cool, it’s new every day :slight_smile:

Yup - I’ve always found that the effective dose of any phero mix will vary with the prevailing conditions - Which is why I tend to carry a togo or two with me so I can modify it as things change.

I would agree that you should do your best to find the sweet spots for work, polite social, restrained social and full-on pulling mode, as well as what works best for significant people in your life.

Well said bro!

I did not really even consider all these variables until Nigs enlightened me, but it makes more sense to me now. The way I see it now, the “sweet spot” cannot be just a single number representing the number of sprays. There are too many critical variables that can change that number.

Instead of the “one sweet spot” model, maybe it should be represented on something resembling a 2D matrix or graph. Each product and mix would have it’s own “sweet spot” graph. The x-axis would be environment - including type, temperature/humidity, number of people (1-on-1, small group, crowded), relationship with people around you etc. The y-axis would be desired effects - ranging from confidence boosting self effects, respect from everyone around you, everyone liking you, etc. Then the data to be plotted would be the dosages and application points.

Even then I feel I’m missing out important factors such as congruence.

I might be over thinking it and it is probably is overkill in most situations. Though, in situations where having the maximum effective dose is very important and can give you the much-needed edge (ie. in business dealings), maybe these extra considerations are necessary.

that would be overcomplicating it a bit, Blazin, and without any more effectiveness. We are human beings (let’s assume :wink: ), as are people we deal with. You never know exactly how are they feeling on that very occasion, how responsive they are to certain pheromones, what mood are they in. That’s even more variables that have more influence on the mix’ effectiveness than, say, just the number of people around or how large the room is. And not only you have no control over these variables; you cannot even possibly judge them beyond certain level of observation and empathy. And even then, it’s usually too late to adjust your pheromone combo, as you can only make those observations as you go.
I think we just need to stick to getting the knowledge the old fashioned way, by getting the experience.

Thanks for the response Tisha and the nomination :smiley:. I’m glad that i’m on the right track, this question has been lingering in my head for about a week now. I thought I was overcomplicating the entire process.

Well said Marihino, thanks for the reply. It’s awesome to see everyone’s point of view on the subject. Thanks again!:slight_smile:

From only 2 weeks worth of testing you have caught on INCREDIBLY well and quick! Great stuff man!
Kinga like fishing, you use different bait for different fish, sometimes you end catching something you didn’t expect ! Or something like that lol! awesome stuff thought I see good things coming from you soon!

Thanks Samuraitea!
I really like to step back and notice things, I rather take it slowly, and let the initial learning curve be shallow, and figure out where I want to be. Rather than rush in, only to be confused with my results!
Love the fishing bait analogy, it’s true!