It’s probably not helpful to start multiple threads, so I’ll keep general P102 comments here and also solicit some unconventional 102 reports. After my first diffuser test of 102 (10 mcg), I noticed something new. I really lack the ability to put into words. I found myself seeking pleasing sight and sound stimuli. Looking for YouTube videos, paying attention to music that caught my interest.
I had trouble detecting self effects with 20 mcg. Tests with this in public buy itself weren’t totally clear. I’m not sure focus is correct. Is this another one of these beautifying molecules? People are seeing focus. If Androtics thinks it’s that good, there’s got to be more. It would really need to give a wearer added benefits. It would need to be either a TAF alternative (help you see hits or help targets see you), or it needs to make targets see you as more attractive. I think it’s the latter, but the real tests will be subjects who report how they feel blindly when you wear it. Do they see focus or otherwise? Maybe it’s time to start paying college women on Craigslist $20 to sniff my “new fragrance market test.” There’s something I’m missing in the reportage on 102. I’ve just enough to retest diffusion and try to duplicate results.
If I am a company–any company–I always have to think about what to restock and why. 102 is Golden13. It’s supposed to be dope, fly sh*t (urban metaphor). OK, I’ll bite. I can read the lines and between them. I’m missing something. What am I missing? What justified(s) it’s inclusion in MX353. I should hear people singing it’s praises. Not so much. There must be a subtlety that user reports are overlooking. Therefore, if you have the stuff, why not retest again and fine tune your observations. Find a subject (if possible), dose them, and see what you feel–or vice versa. If this is boosting the senses, what does that mean, exactly. How does one get laid with this…or does she?
Update:
“There seems to be some desire/craving associated with this one that can manifest both physically and emotionally and can be very sensual in the right context.” That’s it. Sensory craving.
Ok. Now I know why they put it in 353. It’s an intensifier. It does what P79 is supposed to do. Throw in about 2.5 per spray, and it totally intensifies that much None in solution mixes. I will expand upon that in the journal. I’m guessing 102 is the “Golden” alternative to 79 and TAF. You can make your own TUTH or IJ with this, I’d bet. Make your mix with equal amounts 75, 102 and -eNone per spray.