I received molecule c as a freebie with my order. Is there a page that gives a description of this product? And how to use this product?
Thanks
Its an Experimone - The idea is that you test it yourself at different doses and tell us!
Thanks Mobocaster,
I can’t seem to find a post about Molecule C to see what others are experiencing. That would be helpful so I have a better understanding of how molecule c works. I wouldn’t want to wear this to work and make all the ladies horny lol.
I, too, just received this today as a gift with my order (thanks for that!). And I, too, was curious. Then I found this post.
Have a look through that. 
There are a ton of threads on Molecule C (AKA TAC) in here. Tick “Show Threads” on search and you should find them quicker.
However with Putatives, Experimones and MXs, it really is a good idea to test them blind, without reference to other’s reporting. Your findings are of so much more value then and you get to grips with testing and evaluating pheros far better, which helps you on the road to RU-status quicker, and it is worth getting.
It’s usually called TAC. That should help your browsing. But yes, blind testing is so important!
Don’t search! Just use a few sprays during sex or when you need to focus and tell us how it goes!
Not just in those circumstances. Try it in every circumstance.
With a low Mcg to go he doesn’t have enough to test it properly. A new member uses it in an application which gives them favorable result they will buy more and test. With the proper minimum effective dose of tac in general application he won’t learn what tac does on his own with just the to go.
I also can’t suggest good ideas and just say go test?
This is why a lot of members don’t post here anymore. I don’t even lurk. I figure out the molecules I want to use and be done. I know a couple users who know the molecules extremely well but have never reported because the climate is not designed for research. I want users to get up to speed fast and then help us figure out molecular relations.
TAC has optimal dosage and use listed with the search function. If a person won’t use the search function (molecule c does come up) do you think they will crack TAC without help?
Only a tiny number of people will ever reach a high level of enthusiasm about testing putatives. But, it is a steady number of people interested in the Instant Line that provides revenue needed to acquire unprofitable (?) putatives that only make money when they lead to better consumer items. No P96 without A314. I’ve been testing and reporting familiar molecules in microdoses. Has anybody really systematically tested -eNone in .5 mcg increments and reported it? With A314, my tests show 1.25 mcg likely the most universally tolerated added None, and perhaps even work safe. 1 mcg (assuming my pico mol/mcg math was correct) is about what high-androgen, testosterone, -eNone women would make. You smell like a really athletic gym girl. But, backed by eRone, the masculine sig. is clear. But there are limits to empirical testing. Take any five putatives at random and every dose/spray in the store. You will not live long enough to test them all personally. What’s 50 mcg TAC, 5 mcg P75, 25 P114, 1.5 TAF and 30 P78? OK, do this with five more at random. A collaborative approach is better. How many people have TAK and TAF? Is anybody willing to unlock the potential of K at 1 mcg? Try it. If it doesn’t feel like A314 to you, test different doses. Androtics wants more useful data. 'Cause honestly, I haven’t seen much new that wasn’t written 3-5 years ago. 96 and 353 is good. Yeah, I got that. What does 1 mcg P96 do? It begins with you. Take any potent molecule you have, try 1 mcg, write it up.
Everybody new gets a pass for 30 days, to learn the ropes. Thanks for spending money newbies. I love you. But, they need to read the stickies and search. Actually, AD needs to tweak the BB code to tag threads usefully and put the link to tag cloud right out there. If you want science Kimba, it’s all there. Hydrogen bonding of pheromones is real. We can stick with the nebulous alchemy terms like buffering and steering. Anybody know how 2.5 mcg alphanol steers AMMO? Anybody want to learn? Because spraying 2.5 on the skin produces very little I can tell. If it did, IO would cost half as much. A skilled tester, without naming the molecule, should be able to tell me whether it’s likely a sulfate, based just upon the mountain of existing research data. The same molecules in medical research are used as pheromones. But the scientists are only interested in parenteral (injected) use in rodents and humans. They never bother with sprays. 20 years ago, somebody got the idea to order research steroids from medical supply labs and spray it on. It’s just that simple. The question is whether the world is ready to get reality or stay with the bikini women in Penthouse poses and high-impact pheromone marketing. I don’t need the secret Budweiser formula to home brew beer. I do need to know a bit of chemistry and brewing art. But it is also a fact the commercial forces at work will resist discoveries. If everything is supposed to be secret and magic tricks, academia will always reject it. Chemistry texts usually call ANOL a pig pheromone. As long as mones are treated like penis pills and Enzyte (what happened to their mega advert campaigns…oh yeah, I think the Feds got to them), the science is F’ed. There’s too much $ at stake.
So, yeah, I’m prolly bored as you are. And so are others. Now that the other AD is more interested in guitar amps than pimping out exotic molecules…and after you’ve read the 999th post about how great the latest BF mix from XS is…not much left to say, is there. It’s the difference between app developers and the app store. Are you buying (no effort required) or developing (much effort). Whether PTalk devolves to Yelp and Craigslist is a destiny entirely within member grasp.
Here’s some free science content: I view TAC as a positive allosteric GABA modulator and P75 a negative. That’s how they act. Experiments showed the two canceled each other’s effects. Take that biochemical hypothesis, use anything else you find that is “energetic” vs. a neutral baseline, and pair it with TAC. Observe. Layer equal amounts ANOL and e NONE. Observe diffusion changes due to hydrogen bonding, if any. And for the people who have tested 50+ items, I’m ready to here the profound breakthroughs of scientific discovery. The Holy Grail. The cheap, super potent, perfect mix. I’m waiting. But apparently only Dancing Joker has the Sorcerer’s Stone.
PheroTalk Pheromone Research Forum - Tags
Here is the caveat, some of us have tested micro dosage of putatives. And other steroids. Some of us have tested other thing seething may have putitive like properties. I have tested at least a dozen putitive and the product line. I’m not looking to advance the science, I looking to advance the product. How ever we get to that destination is the goal. I want a single product that does what I want it too. Perfectly. Can’t make a profit off of gold? A lot of old users made blends that led to products that were released as a mix and was amazing. That is why we should all want users up to speed quick because where some of us lack in a biological background we make up with social science experience and bravado.
I think the problem last years was the limited and/or out of stock problematic of some very important molecules. The forum was formerly like Christmas and Birthday together, a memorable time. Now it seems to goes upwards, I hope the time comes back.
The only thing I don’t like is the fact that some putative and even experimone molecules are limited (mcg and ml), back then not. That sucks.
I compare several named molecules with the stuff from Androtics and I can say the stuff here is top quality, no question, no hype, no lies and I know that some molecules are more expensive as other ones, but please guys increased the price of the more expensive ones but let’s get us the higher mcg and 30ml like back in the days, or maybe exclusive (a good incentive) only for the reporting users. This are my wishes. 
What were your findings please. Yes, and while I’m not active on other sites, there are very few pheromones or alleged mones about which I haven’t read…extensively. Including yours. And Johnny’s. And it kind of tells you something about the economics of mones that the other AD isn’t selling singles at all. Supposedly, he was just losing his ass financially. I don’t know. You know how expensive Instant Sexiness is. You know for awhile they just couldn’t get TAL, TAH and TAF to make it. You’d agree science and product efficacy aren’t mutually exclusive: one begets the other. Part of what makes some products so great is the science. And it’s why user mixes often fail. Because Harris looked at and understood chemical physics and Jasmin and least understood JMOL, Van Der Waals and dipoles. And most of us will never invent the next A314…because we don’t. I don’t think empirical testing alone is enough. Example, my personal opinion, based upon the chemistry, is that ANOL in AMMO is primarily chemical fixation via hydrogen bonding to eRone and eNone. You really need fixation, or your socials will burn out prematurely. Anyway, the thread was about TAC. Don’t want to jack it. 
I just received my first shipment and am a total infant in this field - search box did eventually turn up some info on “Molecule C” AKA TAC - but it is a little confusing to get a free sample without any expectation as to what the intended effects are (as a noob). Should I wear this at work? Home? Out only? Throw caution to the wind and apply liberally? I ordered A314 and IS - would TAC counteract the effects I am going for?
It’s still sealed up as of this moment. I’m going slow, trying one drop of A314 for a week, then two, then three. Then I’m going to add the IS to see what, if any, difference - so maybe six weeks out I’ll have an experience with TAC AKA Molecule C? Proceeding with caution and reporting back later.
Part of the problem is we sell such high quality goods at such low prices that there isn’t that much for us to work with, that being said we are looking to make “a few changes” as the year goes on, so keep your eyes and ears out for something.
Whatever happened to the spirit of learning and experimentation!
AD throw-ins have never been unsuitable/uncomplementary in all the time I’ve been here. In fact they are usually fairly well chosen to complement your order.
Go-on, just try it! 
I agree with mobocaster..
I haven’t been here that long but all the incentives I’ve received have made my phero experience top notch, not to mention assistance from the forum and to top it all off the gc to get you started… I haven’t seen better service from anywhere in my life.. And not an exaggeration. Plus the money back guarantees, when I don’t even want to send anything back, plus the results and their effect on your life and status. Could one ask for more? Sometimes I’m hesitant to even call when it appears my shipping is late..
I need not say more..
Be right back..
I got to go test…
Believe it or not we do know what we are doing.
…Usually.
The whole point of Androtics Direct is to get our research DIRECTLY into the field to be tested. We do a lot of the leg work to get this otherwise really undeveloped science, an actual chance. If it can get our testers laid and bring people happiness in the process, who are we to stop it? There are stories of such strange things happening to our testers while testing.
But that’s the whole point. Nothing new a crazy happens to those who don’t try something new and crazy.
What am I wearing today? MX463. I have literally no idea what it does but I chose it. And I am noting. Science is what we are doing here gentlemen. All the other things that come with it are just the reward.