3 drops A314, 3 sprays Turn Up The Heat, 2 sprays Instant Shine, 2 Sprays Instant Female Magic
Me: Mid-40s, caucasion, married, good shape, a laid back alpha until …
I applied this combo before the wife and I went out to a social function. The A314 and Instant shine are almost daily wear. I added the TUTH to let the wife know I had “ideas” for later that night and the IFM as I knew she had a stressful day.
Well my plans went as intended later that evening after the kids went to bed. Enough said about that.
The INTERESTING part was while we were at the social function. We ran into a young black female (17) who was with her mother and younger brother. I have met the family before. I am impressed with the young lady - a VERY sharp young lady. A lot sharper than a lot of adults I know. As we are talking I notice that this young lady is locking onto me. No physical contact but she repositions herself to be the closest in her family to me. Her eyes are locked onto mine and sparkling. And she is engaging me in very good conversation. She even apologized to me for not being dressed better. And when her younger brother starts fidgeting, she straightens him right up. I would have thought that the high dose of 'none might have intimidated her as she is kinda young but it seems to have had the opposite effect.
Just for point of interest… I notice that black men respond quickly to cops as well. My Best Friend (just friends) is Black and Male and he always knows when I have it on. Not from the smell but from his reaction to it.
Yes, I have noticed similar reactions with black females, they show much more interest to high levels of aggression
I wonder if its a form of evolution. The less population density the high response to aggression and the higher proportion of the masculine phero’s
I attribute this to the black population simply because they lived in a low density society until the whole slave trade thing
high density (asians) population equals less aggressive masculine phero’s and sensitivity to higher ammounts
if we look at it, its fairly congruent, our society is of more average density overall and the average american seems to be the middle ground of these two extremes
as time goes on a particular race will obviously adapt and change to fit but it takes time to cater down
I am not sure if they are used to higher levels of 'none but in my experience they react strongly and favorably to them.
I have posted in here how on various occasions I have been out with a 'none heavy mix and have had very positive reactions from black females ranging from their mid-20s to mid-50s. Everything from smiles, to slightly flustered, to literally fanning themselves, to one lady started blushing and stroking my hand as we were talking. And with both the hand-stroking lady and lady who was fanning herself, each had a black female friend with them at the time who commented on their reaction to me.
It was not just my interpretation of their reactions. Their friends’ comments confirmed it on the spot.
The reason I say this, BH, is because black men tend to have a naturally high none sig. So a young black female that is raised in contact with the black men in her family; constantly exposed to high none sigs in instances where they are not in danger, is probably less likely to flee from a none heavy mix.
I am not necessarily disagreeing as I have seen this forwarded as a theory to explain the favorable reaction with black females and it certainly makes sense.
I just cannot remember actually reading anything that said study X had measured phermone signatures or output across racial lines and found this to be true. That was the only reason for my intial comment.
True that, BH, neither have I. This is merely something I read in the pherolibrary. I think everything about pheros is so new and fascinating.. and much of it is theory and personal practice. Would certainly make sense as the reason that black women respond to higher sigs, though. Even the younger less experienced ones.
Well, nowadays younger doesn’t necessarily mean less experienced. Not that I am implying anything about this particular young lady, I think the world of her … it just seems kids nowadays are introduced to a lot more than I was at their age …
But that would mean younger and experienced of all races. And this must not be the case, because it has been noted that black women generally respond one way and pale women generally respond another when it comes to none heavy mixes; unless we’re talking older and experienced women that are comfortable with their sexuality.
Also, just because a girl is sexually active does not mean she’s comfortable with her sexuality. This is the case even if she is sexually active from a young age.
These are just ideas, mind you. I’m not trying to say that anything is proven.
I am not talking about reactions to 'none signatures or race here. I am talking about the sex, drugs, violence, metal scanners to keep guns out of school not to mention the stuff my children say happened, discussed, bragged about, etc. in their schools.
And it is stuff that either did not happen when I was in school (I am mid-40s) or seems to be happening at a much earlier time.
As I said, I am not trying to imply anything about race or a particular individual here, much less the young lady mentioned above. What I am saying is that given my experience with young people this age, thinking younger implies less experienced may not be accurate. A lot of these kids are a lot more experienced at MANY things than I was when I was their age many moons ago.
Bosshank pointed this out to me and I just have to mention it or it will bug the hell out of me. I mentioned in my above post My “BF” who is male and black. Well BF stands for Best Friend not Boy Friend. I did edit it.
Ok now I feel better. LOL Tisha is a flirt but she loves her man
“And this must not be the case, because it has been noted that black women generally respond one way and pale women generally respond another when it comes to none heavy mixes”
Wuz dat, sista?? “Pale women”?? I’m ‘offended’ by that derogatory (i.e. racist) term. There was no need for that.
OK - I don’t want to offend anyone or stifle conversations but I would like to get the thread back on track and not go into any tit for tat kinda stuff.
Sorry for the miscommunication, but this was exactly what I was trying to say
I substituted the perceived effect of the 'none which usually is seen as increase in aggression or more sexual for the word because I could not remember what the term was at the time
Its mostly my fault, when I try to get a point across I am never sure how to put it into words, so I try to use an analogy and when I forget terms or words it gets all messed up
I was wondering if there was an effect on the 'none signatures of humans based on if they had been in a high density population or a low density population for a long period of time and many generations, because humans tend to adapt naturally over time and generations to whatever environment they are presented with
and if we look at it like that, it could potentially tell us more about the function of the 'none signature and other traits it may have that we haven’t noticed it having yet
oooh, nice insight makes a lot of sense. also for a family of any race, if the males were aggressive in negative ways, then perhaps using none around their women would actually enhance the negative feelings she has toward you?
anyway, back to being used to a higher none signature from an early age and not being scared of it as a result. would that also make true a hypothesis that such women REQUIRE higher none to be attracted?
That was the only reason for my intial comment.
Not that I am implying anything about this particular young lady, I think the world of her … it just seems kids nowadays are introduced to a lot more than I was at their age …
It just sounded a little funny.
