I just got my fresh copy of Batch 8.
And the first think that i noticed is that the Akuto scent is much stronger than Batch 7.
5 Drops of it and i dont kneed any cologne.
I find this very useful for a good defusing.
Just to be sure i tested one drop from batch 7 and one from 8.
The new one smelled allot stronger than the 7.
Guesses:
batch 8 i stronger scented
or batch 7 is loosing the akude scent over time (which will be weird.. because its one month old only)
With the older versions of A314 (v.15) the scent(EO) stayed for a long time.
But with v15 it was not that strong.
V.17 has really great diffusion thanks to the akuto scent
I have 3 bottles of A314, I use only one. Supposedly, those bottles should last for a year and a half. My question is should the product be effective a year from now? (stored inside my desk in room temperature)
I ask this because I have another A314 bottle in my shopping cart (I thought I should stock on them since you never know what might happen or how the product might change in new versions). So now I’m curious to if that’s a good idea to have 2 years of product in your hands or not.. they might not live.
Hey guys, we’re trying to figure out what’s going on with all the different batches, but Idle, believe it or not, I think you’re one of the few with actual comments about the different batches.
I used 4 bottles of the original with EO scent.
But akuto is much better. I think i upped my A314 usage thanx to the Akuto scent.
I am able to smell it 3-4 hours after application.
People around me smell it too and if they like the scent they take a deeper sniff which is good.
I think that the akuto scent is much more good for diffusion.
BUT… there is something in this v17 that is allot different from v15 that i last used.
Something is missing (replaced)… i need more time to see the difference.
i dont expect androtics to share the change
or at least Jas to mention was it something really removed??
I think the new version i really hard to OD (the ghost effect)
I have Batch 6 version 17. I was wondering in the past if there have been significant leaps in effectiveness from one batch to the next? Or is it usually something minor?