I’m trying to get back with my ex-girlfriend and I’m going to send her some flowers and a note. People often say to spray a little cologne on the letter to give her a physical reminder of you. I just got my first pheromones this week (Ammo, Instant Openness, and TUTH) and I never used pheromones when we were together, but I was thinking if it would be a good idea to provide a hint of one of these pheromones to the letter itself? What are everyone’s thoughts? Thanks in advance for your help.
Depends on how long after you spray the card she gets the flowers if its too long the mones may be gone by then!! But i would advise ammo out of those three.
d23
Thanks for your reply. Does anyone else have anything to add?
To be honest I would put the ammo on you and the card and take the flowers round yourself.
Maybe, but I think if she has not returned my calls just showing up would be a pretty aggressive move. I just want to open the lines of communication up first, with a bit of a scent that will get her thoughts about me going again.
dont take this the wrong way but if she aint answering your calls maybe she dont want to be with you? no amount of mones can change that
It’s a bit more complicated than that.
My opinion is that spraying a scent that she has never associated with you will not have the desired effect. If you ever wore cologne around her before, maybe a spritz of that would do.
What we want when we user pheromones is for our targets to associate the feelings they get from exposure with us. I believe this happens on a subconcious level, enabling the target to (most of the time) associate the effect with us, even if we are in a group of people.
The other side of this coin is that she is your Ex, so spraying a pheromone product on the card is not going to make her more of your Ex. The worst that can happen is that she continues to be your Ex, right?
I’m a newbie with all this pheromone stuff omega, but your comments make sense. She wouldn’t associate the pheromones with me if I never wore them around her before. Good point. Thanks.