Behind the Scenes -- MX Formula Cheat Sheets

I don’t think so. My intention and idea is to build up a library that everyone can study and read about the pheromones listed, and what they can do… It saves a lot of money, time, and re-reading all the threads and posts as well!

An example:
I want to mix A-Androstenol, B-Androstenol, Androsterone, Androstenone, TAA, TAF, P79, P74, Androstadienone, Androstanone, Copulins, Oxytocin, etc. in a small bottle. Which concentration of each ingredient do i need at minimum to be effective, and which concentration is an overdose?
So you can fine-tune your own mixes and not to throw away money and waste your time for long-run testing all the dosages, or which pheromone buffers which, or which fits better with …

Some of the above listed pheromones have effective dosages in microgram and some in nanogram, maybe some in picogram…
I don’t want to have the exact dosage. More like:
I can have 1 ncg/s till 50 mcg/s of this or that ingredient, and it’s overdoselevel starts at maybe 70 mcg/s…

You know what i mean?

Well, that’s the thing even though some claim to already know what a putative, MX, or T does chances are it will never be the same for everyone as we’re all unique to how we react to pheromones. That’s why testing and trial and error while paying close attention to what you see effect wise is usually the best way to know what works for you. Sure it’ll be like having a clue that you can work with, but what good is a clue going to do if you’ll probably not receive the same hits/results?

As far as a neutral dosage goes, that is also dependant on each individual. A little bit of -none for example can be very bad for others, while others can easily wear it at much higher doses without any negative reactions. There’s no standard dose, we’re all different.

I have to agree with reddog as well, only those MX’s that will be discontinued should be listed. I was hoping that MX200 and MX203 did become new release products.

any others ever gonna be added to this list?

Wow, thanks Jasmin, it’s an awesome post!!! It had to come from you! :smiley:

Very useful for continuing adjusting my personal mix ratios! :smiley:

Is there any other mx going to be disclosed?

Thank you all, again!

add MX353 to the list!

Which would mean pretty much all of them at this point. :smiley:

Just had a question. If I wanted to create this mix, how much difference would it make to the original MX200 if I only included the 5mcg/spray items. The items that are listed as 0.125mcg & 0.5mcg end up being less than 5% of the total formula. Each 0.125mcg item takes 0.34% (x6) of the total formula and 0.5mcg item takes 1.36% (x2) of the total formula.
This means 8 elements out of 15 which take less than 5%. 7 of the 15 producing 95% of the formula.

Basically, I am looking to create this mix, but its really expensive to get all the elements listed. Taking out 5% almost halves the cost.(guesstimate). My question is will the 5% make that much of a difference to the overall effect.

Hope someone can answer my questions. Thanks

Those are called steering molecules.

If you can’t steer, you aint-a-goin 'nowhere

Theres a reason why those putatives are there. Pheromones are not lego blocks. Theres a intricate dance and fusion among each and every molecule that gives it that particular effect. Taking even one element out of the formula no matter how minute the quantity can change the effect entirely.

The putatives are not like Androstenol/androstenone/androsterone. You cant just do an abbreviated homebrew of MX200 with half the components missing and expect it to have the same vibe at all. I know it seems unreasonable as 125 nanograms doesnt seem like much of anything. Mixes are about the bigger picture not any single one component though.

Thanks for the clarification.

Just wondering, has anybody had experience in mixing MX200 themselves…and what was the outcome…

What I’d be also interested in is, how much of each component and at what strength was used.

OR could someone make suggestions on what mones i need to puchase to create it (I would prefer to buy them in 30ml bottles).

thanks in advance.

How would you come by p84 in .0125 mcgs per spray?

The best thing you can do is use a 2.5 mcg/spray bottle and dilute it down to 0.125 :slight_smile:

TAA - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
TAF - 5 or 7.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
TAH - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
TAL - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL

P74 - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P79 - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P83 - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P84 - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P85 - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P86 - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
P86 - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL

P87 - 2.5 mcgs/ spray 30 mL
(This one is a pain to get as I havent seen it in stock ever since I joined)

Androstenol - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
Beta Androstenol - 5 mcgs/spray 30 mL
Androsterone - 40 mcgs/spray 30 mL
Androstenone - 2.5 mcgs/spray 30 mL

Now this isnt to say you cant use other quantities of these putatives. Taking into consideration the amount of error that can happen when a amateur mixes so many components together these quantities I find off the top of my head to be the most practical and error reducing.

You have 7x of 5 mcg spray elements so you need something like 35 mcgs a spray or over to keep a even distribution and to prevent yourself from putting too much or too little. For the 0.125 you need the lowest possible quantities for accuracy sake when you mix so 2.5 mcgs a spray is the obvious choice there.

Can’t say I’ve read one person actually making this mix at home but I could do it although its a real bitch that I have no way of getting P87 at the moment :smiley:

How about posting the recipe/formula for the now discontinued Instant Female Magic?

Now, that would be the SHARING OF THE YEAR! :stuck_out_tongue:

Clearly it contained magic. I feel though that it would be a bit redudent now with the rest of the consumer line being so well-rounded.

I don’t think we are going to release this formula any time soon, sorry.

As always we do love to hear your theories and best educated guesses!

I’m pretty POSITIVE I have it down to near perfection, my version. I split test an entire year and the results were amazing. Yes John, there is a good portion of MAGIC in there too. All I can tell you is it aint to easy to come across Unicorn Horn naturally separated from a creature that lives to 10000 years. From my experience the ones on eBay are all fake or worse “harvested” and everyone knows a Unicorn without its horn is a buffalo. Poor creatures. Such tiny wings.

I think I know what most of the ingredients in IFM consisted of and at what ratio; however, I can’t divulge it here, or I might get banned from the PT, lol.

Wouldn’t Pinnochio feel proud :roll_eyes: