Best phero(s) for the gig?

Greetings and hallucinations, everyone. Haven’t used pheromones at all for over year now (for reasons too varied and soporific to lay on you here), so it’s all new to me all over again.

I have a meeting/photoshoot lined up with someone on whom I would really like to make as favorable an impression as possible. It’s a big deal to me; I don’t recall the jitters ever asserting themselves as loudly, forcefully, and persistently as they have in anticipation of this particular gig.

Anyway, so my goal is to make a positive impression on, and build quick and efficient non-verbal rapport with, a caucasian brunette in her early 30s with a fair complexion and… oh… let’s say… a stiletto-sharp, tirelessly-analytical disposition, who’s seen and heard it all. This is obviously a professional situation, but I’d like blur the lines between biz and pleasure in the name of creating the aforementioned comfy rapport. And I’d also like to appear cooler than I really am. :slight_smile:

Soooo… right off the bat, I’m thinking MX203. My questions are: would this be a good choice for the above scenario? Are there any notable side-effects associated with the 203? I ask because i’ve found out the hard way that every mix is different in terms of how it gets on with you; I love the outward influence of the old MX102, but would hesitate to wear it in critical situations because of the self-effects I’d previously experienced. (By the same token, I would never use the old MX103 simply because it stinks like Neil Young’s cowboy boots.)

If not MX203, which others?

Thoughts greatly, greatly appreciated.

(And could you recommend a good tranquilizer and antacid, while we’re at it?)

…look up 292…

Thanks! Will do…

MX292 is supposed to be head-explodingly awesome.

Good to see you Holmes. Of the mxs available right now, MX292 has the best reports for a single product. Purportedly called Pherobomb. Jasmin agreed with Marty’s assessment that it contained -none and P86.

The MX301 -304 test pack is said to be SteveO’s ICM mixes but we don’t know which is which. There are some reports though so you might take a look and see if they appeal to you. 2 are -none based and 2 are P83 based. They have a common thread of TAA, P74 and P93. The -none based ones are additionally buffered with TAC. At least that was the formula Steve posted long ago. There are surely some tweaks since then though.

You know the reports about MX203 too though so that might be a good call.