Bridging the Gap - P96 (long overdue report)

As you all know I have been playing with this one for quite some time and I have reported numerous times I know its an exceptional molecule, but haven’t figured out exactly how it works. On that line of thinking, I haven’t been able to discover even if it works alone or in conjunction with something else. This series of internal thoughts and questions started leading me in a new direction. Perhaps P96 works only when paired with other molecules. A long time ago when I was initially working on the ICM mixes, tacitus directed me to investigate the wonders of TAC and its ability to buffer. There is so much more to that molecule, but I’ll save that for another time. My thought processes on P96 had me going in that direction as well. Not so much as a buffer but some type of pairing that occurs with P96 and well, anything. It just resonates with whatever you wear.

Dancing Joker and I discussed it for quite some time and we both had some ideas on how it worked but we could never really pin it down. LOL, maybe DJ knew all along, but in his own way he was guiding me to discover how it operates without revealing to much. Well one day about a month ago I got an idea that perhaps P96 doesn’t actually buffer anything. It isn’t some type of social lube and in actuality it doesn’t actually work with any molecules but rather it works wholly on its own.

Then like a flash of wisdom the blinders had been lifted and it was clear all along. P96 is a bridge pheromone. It actually traverses rough terrain between any multiple amounts of molecules, any huge gaps and bridges them. Which also therefore explains the disparity of how in some instances I’ve seen it work in as low as 2.5 mcg and in others as high as 60 mcg. Its bridging the divide and however large that divide is and however many molecules it must cross its like the super structure of all bridges.

When it needs to cross the gap of molecules like TAA, P75, P74 and P83 it weaves its way up and over, down and under, around and back again. Its the synergy of all mixes combined into one molecule. Its why mixes like ICM are archaic and need TAC in there to buffer the high doses of -None. The -None in ICM without TAC is an insurmountable obstacle to climb to obtain the results so the TAC is a grading in between the BNol and the -None. Most mixes need to build themselves from a base level to a crescendo and by doing so do not have highs and lows with peaks in and out of the middle that are successful.

I’ve been studying mixes and how each molecule interacts with each other and the most successful of all mixes build and steadily climb. Now I’m not privy to AD’s formulary but I can bet my life that the most successful mixes like Ammo and A314 build from one level and never make a jump from one degree to another without touching all the degrees in between.I’ve seen many mixes come across my PM box and somehow I know hey this one will be a hit. Lets take the catlords PS mix and with all its molecules I can see exactly how it builds from one peak to the next. I can see all the highs and lows and they line up. This does not mean you can go from 1-2-1-2-3-4-3-4-5-6-7-6-5-4-3-2-2-2-2-1. A mix like that works OK and for the most part will effect with good results the highest amount of forum users as synergistic and therefore effective. It’s the mixes that go from 1-3-7 (strong emphasis added) that might still work for some and give results some of the times. They just don’t work for everyone and they certainly don’t work all the time.

What P96 does is fills in the gaps of the above 1-3-7 by bridging and tunneling and added in the necessary peaks and valleys to add synergy to the mix. So where as you now have 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 and the bigger the gap, the larger amount of P96 needs to be worn.

If you’re like me you might realize the HUGE implications this actually has on mix building. I think most of us already talk about synergy of mixes, but do we really understand what it means? I know until I started writing this I had some ideas, but never on this scope. A mix has to build, just like a parfum has base, middle and upper notes so should a mix of mones. You can combo products like Ishine and TUTH because of the brilliance of Michael who already knew this and built in the “steering” pheromones. AD’s mixes are built to compensate how a mix could be worn with other mixes. Its exactly why a mix like IG can be worn, with excellent effects, by combining it with A314. If you really sit and think about it, it shouldn’t make sense, they are both similar so it almost seems like a waste. But it does work.

Just like the ICM mixes and how bosshank, as many others have also, combined A and B to great effect. In our thoughts, as P51 asked, it shouldn’t actually work, because you are doubling up. I worked on that mix for months, if not closer to a full year. When I added something like Rone, it broke the synergy of it and I could never figure it out. Members report on using Rone, but overall for the majority it doesn’t give good results. I added TAK and TAF, all to poor results.

Now formulating 2.0 version I finally get it and how the P96 is so vastly different with different molecules. There’s one particular molecule that if I use it I have to add 10mcg of P96. If I don’t use it than .75 of P96 makes it perfect.

WOW, this is pretty exciting to me. I’m giddy. I need to call Jasmin

Excellent thinking. P96 has been sort of a miss to me, but maybe I haven’t needed it for this function with the mixes I have been using?

I have to little to do any real serious testing with, but what a great observation.

I’m a newbie still working with the consumer line, so a lot of this reads as gobbledygook to me. But it sounds like you’re making some decent findings, so good job bud.

OUT FRIGGING STANDING Steve.

I remember our conversations with P96 and IJ trails I initially used, sometimes with A314 sometimes without and wondering why I was getting great result story.

Initially that is how my whole story has evolved lately with what’s been going on in my journal.

Thank you for posting this.

Makes a lot of sense to me. I wonder what tacitus and dancing joker have to say.

Hmm… As usual this is a great read Steve. I can’t tell if you are brilliant or if you are crazy. I still haven’t written my p96 report. I guess I should.

Your whole perspective is different from mine. You have a lot more experience than I do with pheromones and mixes. I like what you are saying about the building of the molecules. Makes sense when you realize some molecules are required in a mix or it goes flop. Some molecules seem to build on each other.

My perspective is a little different. In truth, I don’t always understand your language. I view putatives and pheromones from the signature they seem to give off. For me p96 seems to give off a “safe” vibe. It appears to be reassuring or secure. So when I add it to a mix or sub it for a molecule it does seem to bridge the gap. However my view is that it tells the receiver that what ever signal they are receiving is ok. Even if I have a boat load of -none and whatever putatives I can find, it’s ok because with the right amount of P96 I’m still safe to talk to and hug for that matter.

And maybe that’s the same thing, but that’s the way I understand it.

Now I get what you were inferring last month. Now I’m curious to see what can be done with this molecule. As always, thanks for the insight

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-happy110.gif

I’m not sure if you are aware of this but tacitus has moved on to another, better plain:

I’m still developing the theory but I get what you are saying. Personally I don’t experience safe from it. On its own I don’t experience anything from it. Maybe we should break out into song here from S&G “Bridge over troubled water” We could get a three part harmony going :slight_smile:

Interesting theory but I agree JosieW, reassuring or secure + romantic effects + a impulse effect, but you must open your target to see it. In mixes I see best effects with 25-30mcg. The more and you see direct attraction effects, big eyes. Interesting is also the caustic humour intensifier on you and others…

Not so much a buffer? Sorry Steve, but P96 is a incredible (none) buffer and kills every sexual, masculine effect. You need at least a 1:1 (P96/none) ratio and have still little respect issues with man. Self-effects are also more beta… The key and most important molecule for this issues is rone.

Anyone tried p75 + p93 + p96? or p75 + p93 + p96 + ammo?

Please stop hijacking threads.:o

Synergy … very good Steve…
P96 does seem to work with all the molecules I have tried. It seems to make a mix work better, more acceptable and approachable. Lights up the mix and makes it friendly, even heavy none mixes. I really like this molecule and it does not seem to take a large dose to have an effect. Kudos!

I second this !

P96 is a very very powerful none buffer and the same applies for P97 !

P96 shifts it more into the romantic site with Rone and None and P97 shifts it more into the social site with with P75 !

Too much P96 or P97 and you´re buffered int BETA ZONE !

for example i put on 10 drops A7 without overdosing with 120 mcg P96 !

a whole Edge gel pack is no problem with 40mcg P96 …

Apart from this i like your theory and i´m gonna shift my focus … in this direction …

You have a different approach to P96 compared to mine and i think it´s worth keeping an eye on it !

Pago

Sounds like we are all mostly in agreement. Like I said I like your approach. Much more detailed thought involved then I can attempt to get into.

I am curious about you never getting anything with it by itself. I certainly did. There are two possible variables here. Targets and testor. So the question is there something different in our natural pheromone signatures that p96 synergized with or were our targets different. Of course the answer to both of those are yes. :slight_smile:

I agree with you steve I was wondering if you could number products so we could know how much P96 is required.

great report. Looks like I might need a little P96 along with more P83 next time I order.

P96 is tricky, however it’s well worth it IMO, however if you’re not going to do any testing and go and try something that other people here haven’t already mentioned then you’re going to be disappointed with results because P96 isn’t in your face blatant.

Trailblazers like Steve, tisha, DJ, tacitus (rip), Warren, and Vis and others who have went ways to go out and try something that other people haven’t is why we have the mixes that we do now.

I’m not saying don’t purchase it, because that’s just going to make me be a hypocrite, but definitely know what you’re getting into before you do. Because this molecule is so rare, I just hate to see someone be disappointed with results because of a tricky, but awesome molecule.

Hey Steve,

Could you explain a little bit what you mean by peaks? I read your entire report and its great stuff congrats!
I think i understand most of it but cant quite grasp exactly what you mean by levels 1-3-7 etc. I realize that you prob need more experience than i do to fully understand but if you could give it a try :slight_smile: I’d be greatly appreciated

Don’t you really mean “P96 is so damn hard to come by I would hate it if anyone read this post bought it and wasted it because they didn’t know what they had?”

Well that’s what I would say anyway. I still haven’t released my report. :slight_smile:

Putatives seem to be in short supply. Some of them are more consistent then others. P96 seems to be consistent, however there are somethings that you have to know. One being that it may affect you and others around you differently then Steve because of your chemical make up, current behavior, and several other factors. I think this whole pheromone thing is like cooking. You really need to know what a spice does before you add it to the food. Too much or too little, and not knowing if you should use it at all could ruin your whole experience. It’s fun to experiment, but because supplies are low the experiment better count because you never know when or if you will see it again. (P130 :frowning:)