Lucky you. ![]()
Definitely more scarce simply due to history and prejudice, but also due to increasing cultural overlaps.
Again, cultural overlaps as you said. Yes, there is a larger grey area now, but that’s due to mixing of culture. Greater media distribution/access to media allows for this. Another factor is that we now recognize that even within ethnicities, there can be significant deviations culture, (say from Korea/China/Japan to Phillipines/Thailand/Burma). That’s not even taking into consideration the various sub-cultures within each culture. So now, it’s not so much an issue of Caucasian/Asian/African-American/Latin culture, but more so Korean-American, Korean-Korean, or American-American. And say, within the Korean-American cultures, there are (for lack of better terms) athletic cultures, social cultures, academic cultures which share similarities, as well as differences, with other athletic/social/academic cultures from other ethnic backgrounds.
I haven’t seen Koreans fresh off the boat and interacted with them, but I did go to Korea and interacted with ‘authentic’ Koreans. My observations were different than my observations here in LA amongst Korean-Americans and American-Koreans, as well as..well just regular Americans.
That’s been more or less my theory as well. We share similar biological triggers, but how we interpret and act on those triggers are influenced by cultural background. One thing that needs to be considered, however, is that often, culture is a result of biological or environmental pressures.
Clothes are culture, which are a result of biological pressures. We were cold and needed shelter. So came clothes, and houses. Diet is a consequence of environmental pressures. We are(were) limited in what we can eat by what is around us. So, if there is a biological factor, I think it would be revealed culturally as well. Another consideration in the development of culture would be societal pressures. Regardless of the environment that caucasian blond you spoke of was raised in, she’s still caucasian, and therefore that alters her experience dramatically. Her experience cannot compare to the experience of an African-American female in the same community. The AA female would most likely integrate much faster into the community and adopt cultural norms more readily (here, I would consider biological factors to play a role - skin color alone is one, although we hate to admit it) than the caucasian female. Also, culture is also tied to the past. AAs have a history of slavery (I speak from an American viewpoint, there are many other cases/exceptions) which is ingrained into their culture. The history of slavery is an aspect of their culture that I doubt many AAs feel can be shared by many, if any, of their caucasian counterparts. That’s not to say that other ethnicities haven’t experienced oppression, but rather that the individual context and history of that specific oppression is interpreted by the oppressed community, trickles its way into the culture, and over time becomes an ingrained facet of their culture.
Thus, I conclude that although there are biological factors that separate us, its the cultural commonalities that allow us to interact and communicate. Without culture, we have no society, we’re just a bunch of human beings operating on our most basic instincts. Culture is what binds us together, even the most polarized cultures (every culture has some sort of eating tradition.) So, if we are attempting to form relationships, I feel that common cultures will lead to more rapid formation of relationships than common biology. Because as far as our reproductive systems are concerned, we are all very common biologically, but there are many cultural differences.
Thanks, you too for bringing up a good discussion.