Could Instant Female Magic come back as a TOGO bottle?

Hello guys!!

I’ve read about Instant Female Magic and I really liked this product as it gives more relaxation in the relationship. In addition, I just noticed that Instant Female Magic is out of stock :open_mouth::open_mouth:. Could you guys make a TOGO version of it? :wink: as I really want to combine it with other mixes but I can’t afford spending that much :frowning::frowning:.

Thank you for your time!!
Razor

Mmmmm… That would be a good one to resurrect…

But, alas, without the A1, Androtics stand on using it, would make for a bad copy… unless, there was an A1 alternative…

1Alpha

.

I take it you somehow managed to miss the great many threads where it is clearly stated that IFM is gone, never to return and why?

Yeah… I did read that somehow it stopped being released on 2006 or something like that. I really wanted to experiment around with it as it sounded unique and different that other mones.

There are also a good number of “IFM alternatives” threads that have some very useful mixes And A1 (the primary component) itself is used my many people in their regular mixes, and near-constantly in discussion.

Can’t you just tell that some of us are sick to death of IFM threads! :wink: :stuck_out_tongue: :smiley:

I never did find any particular threads addressing what the unethical use was. Care to tell me?

Same! I would like to know too!
Anyway I’m gutted that I missed out on this one… WAs going to order a few years ago when I placed my very first order. Never got round to doing it!.. Instead went for other stuff like A314 etc. [spent all my money on those] :frowning:

I have the following products:

AMMO
TUTH
A314
I/O
I/H
I/GENTLEMAN
I/SHINE
I/JERK
P102 (TO-GO BOTTLE)

Hmm i recall reading something along the lines of women buying IFM and using it to make men around them depressed. Or maybe it was men using it around other men… :confused::confused:

OH NO NOT ANOTHER IFM THREAD :frowning:

Look here: Womens Pheromone Guide

We all lament IFM it was a great mone. I had some of my best hits with it and had a load of reports ready when I went to re- buy, I found it was gone.

Read K-tains thread for “similar” mixes to get “similar” hits/effects.

Oh No Not Another IFM Thread

Read this: Womens Pheromone Guide

We all lament IFM it was a very cool pheromone mix; But it has gone forever and things have moved on.
Similar effects can be obtained from some of the mixes suggested in K-trains excellent guide.

Oh No Not Another IFM Thread

Read this: Womens Pheromone Guide

We all lament IFM it was a very cool pheromone mix; But it has gone forever and things have moved on.

Similar effects can be obtained from some of the mixes suggested in K-trains excellent guide.

Its linked, chapter and verse on the other current IFM thread!

Can’t the A-1 be replaced with MX412/MX41?

At the time, John Sebastian had ambitiously created MX412-413 to make a replacement for A1, but I’m not sure it has a similar bonding profile as A1. We don’t have a lot of unbiased feedback on it, either. With a name like “Vs A1”, unbiased feedback is impossible. The name leads the game.

A few things could have been done better. IMHO if John Sebastian obfuscated the intention of the mixpack instead of make it so blatant, maybe we would have had some more honest feedback closer to its true nature. The naming scheme caused demand characteristics. I think calling something “vs. ‘Extremely Hyped Thing in The Pheroverse’” sets a mixpack up for failure.

The last bottles of IFM shipped in spring 2009 and were never restocked. Once the stock depleted, MHarris never allowed it back in production. There are many factors why we reached this decision. Safety, liability, necessity, misuse/abuse, and overall compatibility with our core values. Many have petitioned for a restock, but the answer is always a firm “No.”

If there are putative pheromones anyone can recommend that bear the bonding/female comfort upsides, without the heterosexual male depression/suicidal ideation downsides, we’re always open to the feedback!

No, not fully. Some of the more general comfort aspects yes but the PMS-lifting/crushy aspects - no chance!

Err… Brian.

Some of us have been banging-on about and using the IH/P74 combo for years now for exactly these reasons

Brian I think beta-dienol, is one of the closest molecules your going to get, I don’t know if you have it at as a putative already, I know it’s not a golden 13 molecule, but I theorize that a mix with b-dienol, p96 and p130 would be pretty magical and may even prove to be just as good as IFM.

IIRC the A-1 alternative MXs were submitted as established formulas by a respected user, so their purpose was already known and discussed. Thy were not a typical MX release.

Beta Androstadienol is usually just called Androstadienol. One has to specify the 4-5 or 5-6 double bond, i.e. 3 Alpha or 3 Beta 4-Androstadienol or 5-Androstadienol. There are acutually four forms one could call androstadienol. The 5-6, 3-Beta form is common. The metabolic pathway is Beta Dienol > A1 > -eNone > androstenol. One pheromone vendor mentions this; however, it would have to “convert” through 4 REDOX reactions and would start to smell before it got to alpha nol. Has anyone tested this and noted the -eNone smell? The conversion usually discussed is the armpits, where the smell bacteria are. Most people don’t apply mones to their pits and don’t have smelly forearms and necks. Axe neck deodorant?

Brian, you keep asking me for ideas. I’d strongly suggest letting expert users test named molecules with a MS Access database using their registered email and a SKU number as a primary key. So, pherouserdotcom + 12345 = dienol. That’s how you label it. They order/reorder via the SKU number. Only you would know which named molecule matches the primary key. That’s to give feedback on it. Because, otherwise, people are going to buy the named molecules elsewhere and do it anyway. The putative testing concept has to evolve to reflect new vendors, competitors that weren’t around 5 years ago.