yonger people have to use a smal dosage when aplying pheroes
while older people can use a bigger dosage
does that give older people an advantage?
Your question is difficult to understand. You might try writing it in a different way.
Not exactly, remember, it all depends on a persons body chemistry.
Some kids produce much more -none than others, so they don’t have to wear as much. Some kids produce less -none, so they can get by with wearing more. A very very healthy 30yr old guy may produce more -none than a unhealthy mickie D’s diet boy. And it also depends on the people you’re around. Older women tolerate more -none than younger women, yet some younger women may have a higher tolerance than other younger women. ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect.
Nah, it doesn’t give the older people an advantage. I produce most of my own -none, so I would only need like one spray of TUTH in certain situations, whereas in 25 years, I’ll probably need 4 shots of the same to acheive the same effect, since my own natural -none levels will have diminished considerably by then.
Interesting question.
Young men are perceived differently. They are generally the most dangerous people around. In almost every society the demographic segment with the highest violent crime rate is the young males.
A young guy with a strong none signature scares a lot of people. An older guy might get away with the same none signature and no scary effect.
No. Actually that gives younger people an advantage, cause it costs less for them. 
creaky olde phart sayeth:
being a creaky old fart and using a phero signature… a varying signature developed out of about a decade of trial an error… lesson #1 is there is no “holy grail”… it is akin to knowing how to tune a musical instrument with each change of temperature, humidity, group dynamic… and lesson #2… this is important, too.. is that pheromones have long term behavioral effects on the user (if you use them right) that slowly expose the user to behaviors, situations, social contexts that the user would otherwise not have as part of one’s life inventory…
Now, here is where #1 and #2 have interesting results: I “ought” in terms of bodily output be signaling a different phero signature… obviously a much different one than my synthetic self is radiating when I spray a mix…
Annnnd… there is a definite forebrain-midbrain incongruity response in more than one person of both sexes 
based on feedbacks from the unconscious selves of younger straight women, older gay men, lesbians, younger guys in work-learning contexts… in all cases there is a subtle confusion, like they are seeing double in the faintest way… the visual processes are saying “older guy” with all the behavioral, attitudinal, expectational things, positive and negative that go with that perception, and these are competing with limbic processes that say… young studly guy…
OK… here’s where is gets weird and psychologically interesting… the brain is know for resolving incongruity in marvellous and surprising ways… I’ve had more than one person say directly to me they couldn’t figure out if I was 25 or if I was 50… as if their brain actually performs some kind of visual remapping of my appearance based on limbic cues…
If that is so, and it well might be so, then this is a major transformation in the way the field of social and perceptual psychology operates, because it suggests something absolutely revolutionary, copernican if you will, that we don’t actually “see” each other, as much as we construct models or internal images of each other that do not exactly conform to external reality, and lower brain processes may cause us to perceive another person as beautiful, hideous, indifferent… young, old, ageless, skeletal… somewhat independent of that person’s “true appearance”…
BINGO!
See my old thread
Conceptual models aren’t all that revolutionary. However, the input stimulus for building them needs to be reevaluated.
Pheromones do more for older users, I believe - mones give us a chance to catch up with the un-moned youngsters!
Loved tacitus’ post.
Being, err, middle aged I have some experience here. As a young man I was only mildly successful with the womenfolk. More misses than hits. Now I was totally into my career and spend most of my quality time practicing, performing on the road. I think I only got a few GFs and one nighters because of sheer luck.
After many years of marriage I found myself single again. I have a good job, ample disposable cash and keep myself fit and fashionable. I can actually say I’m in better physical shape than I was when I was 25. I also I have much better social skills and great patience–things I lacked as a young man. The bottomline is the combination of better social skills, higher social position and mones has treated me well indeed. Now I still strike out but my success rate with women is higher than it ever was. And, oddly, women come on to me all the time. Even more odd is the fact that most of the women are much younger than me, women I would have killed to have been with while a starving college student.
So yeah, well presented and preserved OFs laced with mones can have a significant advantage over youngin’s.
Tacitus, GWTW, you two just changed my life… my 4 lil old rep points go to each of you, and thank you a million times over!