Reports of women using P75 are far more favorable than those with None. I can give you a guess, but more expert input would be required. There’s a tremendous opportunity for more experimental female mixes. One major setback: the leakage of the small putative bottles has to be dealt with. I can’t recommend you purchase them right now at consumer price. I don’t like saying so, but I can’t ignore reality. I would suggest instead you get the 30 mL at 2.5 per spray.
P102, P75, TAC.
Mix all three equally in a TOGO by spraying and layer that with IS/A. You can also ratio 1:1:2 or 2:1:2 (102, 75, T A C). That combination should grab peoples’ attention. It is as much the novelty–that these molecules may be rare in nature–that grabs people. 75’s potency has to do with that people don’t encounter it in daily life much. The novelty stuns them. You can also OD on 102, I do believe. I think it can cause ghosting over 10 mcg or so in mixes. They used it in MX353. Treat it like P79. TAL and TAH are going to be a bit $ for you. They’ve always been a tad scarce. Better to get IS/A and steer it. If women want to buy TUTH, they should dilute it in something like TAC. You have much more precise control on the None for self and others. Makes you and men less grumpy. TAC, used properly, can easily buffer 20 mcg of None.
Also…
I’d forgotten this bookmark on IS/A vs A314B spray. You could try 314B. Now, the store says 314B is still rev. 29, so I hope the advice still holds. 314 oil changes with every revision, so old forums don’t always compare. In fact, you should try and report on it, because women would be way better off with a buffered status product than with TUTH. Lots of girls seem to want TUTH. I’m not sure they know how potent None is when females wear it. If you test and recommend 314B (current version) as an Alpha female alternative to IS/A, I’m turning to your recommendation. Go ahead and bump the thread.
Instant Sexiness A Fans Please Read and Respond - PheroTalk Pheromone Research Forum