I just want to know, because from an evolutionary standpoint, Mother Nature would naturally want the people with better genes to attract the most people of the opposite sex. So I am wondering if better looking people naturally produce more mones. (By better looking, I mean by biologically absolute values ie. golden ratio, taller, etc…)
I feel this would make sense, as nature doesn’t necessarily want the ugly to continue on. Recent studies have shown that better looking people have better immune systems, and are even more naturally intelligent. So I would assume Nature would bless them with better mone production as well.
Whats ugly to you and whats ugly to Mother Nature are two different things. Pheromonal communication and visual attraction are two different things.
Healthier more fit people with good muscle mass tend to make higher levels of certain hormones so in turn it would make sense they probably secrete more of certain kinds of pheromones. There are lots of healthy fit people that other people do not find visually attractive though.
Your hormones have no ideal whether or not your ugly they only know about your biology.
So its fitness, health and age that make the most difference. Height possibly could play into it but I have never seen studies on it.
Its more survival of the strongest healthiest not survival of the most visually appealing.
You rarely get the entire package all at once. I’ve oft noticed the opposite: drop dead beautiful women with no apparent mone “chemistry” and plain women with terrible personalities whom are strangely alluring. Nevertheless if “better” genes were more attractive if would be difficult to rationalize the abundance of ugly, short, unhealthy and not so bright folk populating the planet. What I noticed is a lot of guys will screw any wet hole and worry about their regrets the next day… So much for evolution of the human race.
As for height, I prefer smaller women, say 4’10" to 5’2". Tall women don’t ring my bell. And see lots of short women with families and husbands/boyfriends so they may be taking over the world…
The problem with natural mone production is most of us wash them off long before they build to significant levels. Realize much of the production occurs when skin bacteria act on your natural fluids such as sweat, urine, sperm, vaginal extracts, etc.
Im a college professor and haven’t noticed a trend towards higher intelligence among my attractive students. In fact, the the plainer ones tend to do better academically and express more fully formed ideas in class discussions. Perhaps the attractive ones are so smart they pretend to be dull underachievers in order to operate incognito…
While many standards of beauty will vary depending on cultural influences, one thing is almost universal and that is bilateral symmetry. Facial symmetry has been shown to be an indicator of genetic stability and health and many hereditary conditions will be reflected in the face as it’s developed in utero… One of the putatives is attributed to having an instant airbrush sort of effect. with many users reporting that it seems to have an effect of making them seem more physically attractive and appealing. My theory is that whatever molecule this is, it’s production may be proportional to ones degree of bilateral symmetry. The more symmetrical you are, the more of this particular pheromone you produce. Which would be a pheromonal signal that activates the same portions of the brain that the sight of a visually appealing person would. Of course this is just my personal theory.
also, attraction is relative. Some girls like skinny, leaned and well-toned guys, while others like big buff guys. Some like pretty-boys, while others like jagged, tough dudes.
Moreover, Black girls like high -none; white girls like medium to low -none ; asian girls medium-low to low.
A high mone content probably makes one look and appear healthier, which alone leads to increase in attraction.
I’ve grown to suspect female biological responses to mones are similar across the various races. However cultural/socialization factors as well as personal confidence and experience largely dictate initial outward responses. In other words, Asian women and Black women feel similar inside when exposed to mones but react differently due to their differing values and culture. In my experience, racial response differences tend to fade or even disappear once they know and trust you. The reason I say this is I find both East and Southeastern Asians very responsive to medium to high doses of anone (NPA & TE) and are really no different than my past Black GFs. The main diff is I must break them in more gradually as they are more easily scared off. Of course I’m an Asian male so it’s likely my total natural/artificial output differs from most of the White guys on this forum.
Oddly enough, Black women have always been attracted to me long before I used artificial mones. And I’m a two shower a day, near hairless and sweatless East Asian so go figure. Most be other more important factors influencing attraction beyond mones or I’d be out of luck. It’s a miracle those 2 billion low mone Chinese get laid so much…
There is inborn beauty, as a function of health and good genes which most likely correlates positively with all kinds of good genes. Healthy people with good genes are likely to be symmetrical, be intelligent and have balanced hormones. Also, a man who is intelligent enough to reach a high status is more likely to have children with a beautiful woman. Someone with a few undesirable qualities probably finds a partner who also has a few undesirable ones.
Then, there is what we make of our looks. Here, I could see why less intelligent seeming people sometimes look better. The energy that is spent in the gym, on tanning beds, shopping and doing makeup is not spend reading, studying, attending lectures etc. People who haven’t got anything else going for them also tend to make more of an effort with their looks. Some very intelligent people neglect their bodies.