Noobie question A and B-nols

Hi,

So as I’m understanding from my reading of the forum, Instant Openness and Instant Honesty rely on their differing ratios of A to B-Androstenols. Is that correct? I read that Instant Honesty is 70% Beta and 30% Alpha, while Instant Openness is 70% Alpha and 30% Beta.

:roll_eyes: My question is, if these mixtures rely on the pheromone ratios for their effects, doesn’t wearing them BOTH mess up what you are trying to achieve?

If you’ve worn them both separately and together, what changes did you notice in their effects?

Diane

Combining 70:30 alphanol and betanol directly with 70:30 betanol and alphanol will give you a 50:50 ratio that, in fact, is the basis of another phero product from Androtics: Come Talk To Me.

Several people wear Instant Openness and Instant Honesty on different areas, I guess they expose the areas differently depending on what effect they wish to project. I have not tried this though I have IO and a separate bottle of betanol to add to combos to deepen the effect, which I find is more my style.

Yes wearing both together can mess up the ratio but not severely. I never wear them at the same time. I either go for Instant Openness or Instant Honesty when I layer. If I want them both I will go with CTTM which is a more raw blatant chatty mix. It dosnt have as much of the close feeling as IH does on its own and it dosnt have as much as the fun friendly feeling IO has. but it will make people talk to you.

Michael has said you can use them both together to get the CTTM effect, I just personally feel its over kill.

I dont use IO much because people get on my nerves LOL I find myself wanting to say “shut up already” LOL I just use it at social events, parties or in a mix to buffer.

CTTM I like but I find I need to tell people to “get away from me” LOL They really “come talk to you” alot LOL

I find I like IH the best out of the chatties for me at least. :smiley:

Tisha

I had read a post by Mharris recently and he said the openness and honesty is buffered more than cttm so it would seem that combining the two instants would be a little more refined than cttm even though they would ultimatly have the same effect.

Yes, thank you. This post is 6 months old. This question has been answered many times in that time.

Diane

oh lol yes I see that now sorry and thank you for bringing that to my attention in such a curt and yet kind fashion.